All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	dominik.dingel@gmail.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: s390: Only notify on 4k pages
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:31:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84a83cd2-28dd-98a1-2b50-09044c2d3798@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26ef13f7-dfd4-de7d-b448-0084df956d27@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1836 bytes --]

On 25.01.2018 17:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 25.01.2018 16:33, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Let's try this
> 
> Actually we can reduce this code here quite a lot by simply checking for
> 
> if (pmd_large(*pmdp)) {
> 	// splitup
> 	rc = EAGAIN;
> }

Yes, we can. (and I did)
It actually looks a lot better now, thanks!

I'm still dreading the rebase to put the changes into the original
patch, though. :)

>> -	/* Remove the page table tree from on specific entry */
>>  	head = radix_tree_delete(&sg->host_to_rmap, (vmaddr & HPAGE_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>>  	gmap_for_each_rmap_safe(rmap, rnext, head) {
>>  		bits = rmap->raddr & _SHADOW_RMAP_MASK;
>>  		raddr = rmap->raddr ^ bits;
>> -		switch (bits) {
>> -		case _SHADOW_RMAP_REGION1:
>> -			gmap_unshadow_r2t(sg, raddr);
>> -			break;
>> -		case _SHADOW_RMAP_REGION2:
>> -			gmap_unshadow_r3t(sg, raddr);
>> -			break;
>> -		case _SHADOW_RMAP_REGION3:
>> -			gmap_unshadow_sgt(sg, raddr);
>> -			break;
>> -		case _SHADOW_RMAP_SEGMENT_LP:
>> +		if (bits ==  _SHADOW_RMAP_SEGMENT_LP)
>>  			gmap_unshadow_segment(sg, raddr);
>> -			break;
>> -		case _SHADOW_RMAP_SEGMENT:
>> -			gmap_unshadow_pgt(sg, raddr);
>> -			break;
>> -		case _SHADOW_RMAP_PGTABLE:
>> -			gmap_unshadow_page(sg, raddr);
>> -			break;
>> -		}
> 
> Now this looks much better. Do we still need the _SHADOW_RMAP_SEGMENT_LP
> check in gmap_shadow_notify() ? don't think so

Well the l2 big -> l3 little case also needs _SHADOW_RMAP_PGTABLE, so we
need at least an if/else. I forgot about that case yesterday but just
fixed it up...

Also I'm seeing increased migration time, the 10g l2 takes 1m20s on
postcopy (1m30 precopy) to migrate, which took 30 - 45s before. However,
I did not run into any problems yet, so we got that goin' for us, which
is nice.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-26 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-13 12:53 [RFC/PATCH v2 00/22] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 01/22] s390/mm: make gmap_protect_range more modular Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 11:33   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 12:31     ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 12:50       ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 13:02         ` Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 02/22] s390/mm: Abstract gmap notify bit setting Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 11:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 03/22] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification Janosch Frank
2017-12-21  9:24   ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 11:46   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 13:13     ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 13:29       ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 14:04         ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 11:56   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 12:09     ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 12:12       ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 04/22] s390/mm: Add gmap pmd invalidation and clearing Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 05/22] s390/mm: hugetlb pages within a gmap can not be freed Janosch Frank
2018-01-24 13:45   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-24 13:56     ` Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 06/22] s390/mm: Introduce gmap_pmdp_xchg Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 07/22] RFC: s390/mm: Transfer guest pmd protection to host Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 08/22] s390/mm: Add huge page dirty sync support Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 09/22] s390/mm: clear huge page storage keys on enable_skey Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 10/22] s390/mm: Add huge pmd storage key handling Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 11/22] s390/mm: Remove superfluous parameter Janosch Frank
2017-12-21  9:22   ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-16 12:39     ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-16 13:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 13:14   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-22 13:24     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 12/22] s390/mm: Add gmap_protect_large read protection support Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 13/22] s390/mm: Make gmap_read_table EDAT1 compatible Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 14/22] s390/mm: Make protect_rmap " Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 15/22] s390/mm: GMAP read table extensions Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 16/22] s390/mm: Add shadow segment code Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 17/22] s390/mm: Add VSIE reverse fake case Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 18/22] s390/mm: Remove gmap_pte_op_walk Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 19/22] s390/mm: Split huge pages if granular protection is needed Janosch Frank
2018-01-25  7:16   ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-25 14:39     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-25 14:55       ` Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 20/22] s390/mm: Enable gmap huge pmd support Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 21/22] KVM: s390: Add KVM HPAGE capability Janosch Frank
2017-12-20 13:02   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-12-20 13:17     ` Janosch Frank
2017-12-20 13:21       ` Cornelia Huck
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 22/22] RFC: s390/mm: Add gmap lock classes Janosch Frank
2017-12-20 12:24   ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-12-20 12:36     ` Janosch Frank
2017-12-20 12:23 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 00/22] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement Christian Borntraeger
2017-12-21 12:00   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-22  9:08     ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-02  0:02       ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 11:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 11:56   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-23 21:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-24  9:01   ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-24  9:14     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-25 15:33       ` [PATCH 0/2] Huge page pte protection Janosch Frank
2018-01-25 15:33         ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: s390: Only notify on 4k pages Janosch Frank
2018-01-25 16:04           ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-26 10:31             ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2018-01-25 15:33         ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: s390: Rename gmap_pte_op_fixup Janosch Frank
2018-01-26 10:34       ` [PATCH v2] mm: s390: Only notify on 4k pages Janosch Frank
2018-01-30 10:19         ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84a83cd2-28dd-98a1-2b50-09044c2d3798@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dominik.dingel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.