From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's x86i
Date: 12 Jul 2001 08:58:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84jaV$Qmw-B@khms.westfalen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107111858110.1811-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <p05100361b77232f67994@[207.213.214.37]> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107111858110.1811-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
davej@suse.de (Dave Jones) wrote on 11.07.01 in <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107111858110.1811-100000@Appserv.suse.de>:
> Given the PR disaster that the P3 serial number brought about,
> I'd be surprised if Intel were to revisit that chapter of history :)
Though much of that has been bad PR handling, I think. It's not as if
Intel invented that feature - for example, every s390 system has one (and
so did the whole family at least since the /370, used for licenses, for
example), and everything living on ethernet is supposed to have a unique
MAC address. (Which *has* already been used in tracing authors of
malicious Windows software, I believe.)
OTOH, ISTR that under VM, it's possible to simulate the /370 etc. cpuid of
someone else. Which I know has been used to circumvent license
restrictions.
Then again, the US custom of using the SSN as a generic index would be
rather illegal over here, so that might change peoples attitudes to the
mere existance of those numbers - it does make a difference how big a
stick you can wield.
Not that any of this is important to Linux ...
MfG Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-12 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-11 3:19 Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's x86info Jordan
2001-07-11 4:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-11 4:37 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-11 4:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-11 5:04 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-11 11:00 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-11 12:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2001-07-11 12:23 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-11 14:09 ` [PATCH] " Hugh Dickins
2001-07-11 14:28 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-11 16:47 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-11 17:00 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-12 6:58 ` Kai Henningsen [this message]
2001-10-10 1:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-11 16:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-11 15:51 ` Jordan Breeding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='84jaV$Qmw-B@khms.westfalen.de' \
--to=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.