All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
	Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.hadli@ti.com>,
	dlos <davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, LMML <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	hverkuil@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] davinci: vpfe: Add documentation
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 16:22:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8524664.XGp3WDre5y@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120901095707.GB6348@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>

Hi Sakari,

On Saturday 01 September 2012 12:57:07 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 08:11:50PM +0530, Prabhakar Lad wrote:

[snip]

> > For test pattern you meant control to enable/disable it ?
> 
> There are two approaches I can think of.
> 
> One is a menu control which can be used to choose the test pattern (or
> disable it). The control could be standardised but the menu items would have
> to be hardware-specific since the test patterns themselves are not
> standardised.

Agreed. The test patterns themselves are highly hardware-specific.

>From personal experience with sensors, most devices implement a small, fixed 
set of test patterns that can be exposed through a menu control. However, some 
devices also implement more "configurable" test patterns. For instance the 
MT9V032 can generate horizontal, vertical or diagonal test patterns, or a 
uniform grey test pattern with a user-configurable value. This would then 
require two controls.

> The alternative is to have a boolean control to enable (and disable) the
> test pattern and then a menu control to choose which one to use. Using or
> implemeting the control to select the test pattern isn't even strictly
> necessary to get a test pattern out of the device: one can enable it without
> knowing which one it is.
> 
> So which one would be better? Similar cases include V4L2_CID_SCENE_MODE
> which is used to choose the scene mode from a list of alternatives. The main
> difference to this case is that the menu items of the scene mode control
> are standardised, too.
> 
> I'd be inclined to have a single menu control, even if the other menu items
> will be device-specific. The first value (0) still has to be documented to
> mean the test pattern is disabled.
> 
> Laurent, Hans: what do you think?

A menu control with value 0 meaning test pattern disabled has my preference as 
well.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-01 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1342021166-6092-1-git-send-email-manjunath.hadli@ti.com>
2012-07-15 12:46 ` [PATCH] [media] davinci: vpfe: Add documentation Laurent Pinchart
2012-07-17 10:43   ` Hadli, Manjunath
2012-07-26  0:12     ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-07-26  0:13       ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-07-26  0:25     ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-07-27  5:49       ` Hadli, Manjunath
2012-07-27 10:49         ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-07-31  7:45           ` Manju
2012-08-02 21:25             ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-08-02  0:07 ` Sakari Ailus
2012-08-09  3:43   ` Manjunath Hadli
2012-08-16 16:23     ` Sakari Ailus
2012-08-22  8:56       ` Manjunath Hadli
2012-09-01 17:25         ` Sakari Ailus
2012-09-01 17:26           ` Sakari Ailus
2012-09-04  6:14           ` Manjunath Hadli
2012-08-29 14:41       ` Prabhakar Lad
2012-09-01  9:57         ` Sakari Ailus
2012-09-01 14:22           ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2012-09-01 14:53             ` Prabhakar Lad
2012-09-01 16:11               ` Sakari Ailus
2012-09-02  3:03                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-09-02  8:44             ` Hans Verkuil
2012-08-16 13:10 ` Rob Landley
2012-08-16 13:24   ` Prabhakar Lad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8524664.XGp3WDre5y@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manjunath.hadli@ti.com \
    --cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
    --cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.