From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 6C093E00754; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:16:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (p_j_r_m[at]yahoo.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [212.82.96.135 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from nm8-vm1.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm8-vm1.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.135]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84729E003A8 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:16:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1426288591; bh=/53m8lXsuJ91HnBve98L01aIz5PwQhWuElZLg8DxZ+k=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=cYckwMONdEsbgeJUa1grsW+kgi52/3lK/jzfpoHIQfyEzO58Ftn5jqbGbb7y8HYUqfKFA6nFtRhi2kh2tne+ZJHUGXZ0TpbpiIupQBfkTwPnLVhwsBXm/5V9XPREwO6rCE/714atAfs1M0R4OSwW2AdB/RrpQP3YRLN5n5URAZjVc3AcgAizBYFLCmX7A4aLT5lCADqJ65aV0XCqeYzTj+tpprEuywjho+EDJwh/aI50gffGB+ePf7YBfvd0nOx0xpplWr1Vxz7IYppI4CxtgakvCR8w+Xz5kCKxtlE9dCQ31ZsBoTFpQUb8/ZaxhoIpfkbppysINd8LSayvkH7xDQ== Received: from [212.82.98.49] by nm8.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Mar 2015 23:16:31 -0000 Received: from [212.82.98.109] by tm2.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Mar 2015 23:16:31 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1046.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Mar 2015 23:16:31 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 305268.33847.bm@omp1046.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: uABfpSkVM1mbYinwDtxLPJOMLQC4pnX5qeKtj3AsP._ayZGMFGSITY8JFehpuP2 u.86nVe2pBu3GLbDvRYt59Jp95_NIi0NIs5w_zWsxh.O.A.SQYtSkSj94MnwYCDDdFBm1A371okh s2HQHk8Rdd7GPQmQzyu1nHsmvPhFlqQjs1emihw4YvqLRhwk5.CG7xMxkPClHDgtB3DMEzxY3C4M GatQRjQcM8IyMaqiu0APdb5ycCB5_pI9JAKib3x2L3Z9kjPj8KufEZJjGg7i4eWj3T.9HamKjFNB zFGDHc2LMSyan90dtC4WLmK_yTk8vRU.FFnAbO0ltZSRdCCvafZZwCPD6jXuCUpLcJVrH8hbUq74 8ys5yrqZUdEZ6vT0V7vBhKLOVD8jOIYJrxMQa3y_wSdC.nQjC6BtWlO77mWW_ld0w30hKjuRNsLm NmIoMnjd2._gqeMggWnlKeFkjiAOQbV0W909yyCxllgtPY4j4acfU0H7GuGzC4aOjGT9sm8cyh1h TzndzBi48ojn475qj3nTmF_7VOtBx6o05nIab4CfoEbr4IsXpKef3qzg- Received: by 217.12.9.14; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 23:16:30 +0000 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 23:16:30 +0000 (UTC) From: p_j_r_m To: Paul Eggleton Message-ID: <853683642.3620249.1426288590548.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1637612.gAra2p1qXC@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1637612.gAra2p1qXC@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , Gary Thomas Subject: Re: File in append recipe not installed X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: p_j_r_m List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 23:16:36 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3620248_608800704.1426288590546" ------=_Part_3620248_608800704.1426288590546 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for your suggestionsThe problem was that my recipe files were taken = from sstate directories, even when they were previously cleaned with bitbak= e -c clean. If I use -c cleansstate instead, all is ok . =20 El Viernes 13 de marzo de 2015 9:17, Paul Eggleton escribi=C3=B3: =20 On Thursday 12 March 2015 18:01:16 Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2015-03-12 17:21, p_j_r_m wrote: > > I've tested it, but the problem is the same. > > My bbappend recipe is not even called ,so it does not matter what i put= in > > it. Why is not called? > > Please don't top-post :-( >=20 > How do you know that your bbappend isn't being used/called?=C2=A0 If you = name it > incorrectly, e.g. base-files_3.0.99.bbappend, you should get an error > telling you that there is no base-files_3.0.99.bb which matches.=C2=A0 He= nce if > it's named base-files_3.0.14.bbappend and you get no error, it *is* being > used. >=20 > Please show exactly what is now in your layer (as below).=C2=A0 It's real= ly easy > to make a mistake with a '_' instead of '-'. Also, one way to tell for sure whether it is being parsed is to use: =C2=A0 bitbake-layers show-appends=20 If it's not listed there, check that the layer shows up in: =C2=A0 bitbake-layers show-layers If the layer doesn't show there, check if it has been correctly added to=20 bblayers.conf. If it is, check that your layer.conf is setting BBFILES such= =20 that bbappends in the directory you placed the bbappend in will be picked u= p. Cheers, Paul --=20 Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ------=_Part_3620248_608800704.1426288590546 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks for your suggestions
The problem was that my recipe files were taken from ssta= te directories, even when they were previously cleaned with bitbake -c clea= n. If I use -c cleansstate instead, all is ok .


= El Viernes 13 de marzo de 2015 9:17, Paul = Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> escribi=C3=B3:
 <= /div>

On Thursday 12 March 2015 18= :01:16 Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2015-03-12 17:21, p_j_r_m wrote:
= > > I've tested it, but the problem is the same.
&g= t; > My bbappend recipe is not even called ,so it does not matter what i= put in
> > it. Why is not called?
>
> Please don't top-post :-(
&= gt;
> How do you know that your bbappend isn't being = used/called?  If you name it
> incorrectly, e.g. = base-files_3.0.99.bbappend, you should get an error
> = telling you that there is no base-files_3.0.99.bb which matches.  Henc= e if
> it's named base-files_3.0.14.bbappend and you g= et no error, it *is* being
> used.
&= gt;
> Please show exactly what is now in your layer (= as below).  It's really easy
> to make a mistake = with a '_' instead of '-'.


Also,= one way to tell for sure whether it is being parsed is to use:

  bitbake-layers show-appends

If it's not listed there, check that the layer show= s up in:

  bitbake-layers show-la= yers

If the layer doesn't show there, = check if it has been correctly added to
bblayers.conf. I= f it is, check that your layer.conf is setting BBFILES such
that bbappends in the directory you placed the bbappend in will be pick= ed up.

Cheers,
Paul<= br clear=3D"none">
--

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre



=
------=_Part_3620248_608800704.1426288590546--