From: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>, spamtrap@knobisoft.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Understanding I/O behaviour - next try
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:43:08 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <856205.2054.qm@web32611.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46D59DE2.2070405@redhat.com>
--- Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/28/2007 11:53 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> >
> > The basic setup is a dual x86_64 box with 8 GB of memory. The
> DL380
> > has a HW RAID5, made from 4x72GB disks and about 100 MB write
> cache.
> > The performance of the block device with O_DIRECT is about 90
> MB/sec.
> >
> > The problematic behaviour comes when we are moving large files
> through
> > the system. The file usage in this case is mostly "use once" or
> > streaming. As soon as the amount of file data is larger than 7.5
> GB, we
> > see occasional unresponsiveness of the system (e.g. no more ssh
> > connections into the box) of more than 1 or 2 minutes (!) duration
> > (kernels up to 2.6.19). Load goes up, mainly due to pdflush threads
> and
> > some other poor guys being in "D" state.
>
> Try booting with "mem=4096M", "mem=2048M", ...
>
>
hmm. I tried 1024M a while ago and IIRC did not see a lot [any]
difference. But as it is no big deal, I will repeat it tomorrow.
Just curious - what are you expecting? Why should it help?
Thanks
Martin
------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch
email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de
www: http://www.knobisoft.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-29 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-28 15:53 Understanding I/O behaviour - next try Martin Knoblauch
2007-08-29 1:38 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-29 1:38 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-29 8:15 ` Martin Knoblauch
2007-08-29 8:40 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-29 8:40 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-29 9:22 ` Martin Knoblauch
2007-09-13 14:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-29 9:48 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-29 14:26 ` Martin Knoblauch
2007-08-30 10:50 ` Martin Knoblauch
2007-08-29 16:25 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-08-29 21:43 ` Martin Knoblauch [this message]
[not found] <fa.tV0SjP5wHRgCEzqJw2C8w4+Fh90@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.NN9klzYbZhoZ+YoOWgrMeLtzlHE@ifi.uio.no>
2007-08-29 14:27 ` Robert Hancock
2007-08-30 10:26 ` Martin Knoblauch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=856205.2054.qm@web32611.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=spamtrap@knobisoft.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.