From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72F641C92 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738832992; cv=none; b=jI2aJewh9rOo44oyJD6qT9FoQD7iugRUt5Yax9uGi4yWquatieRmDbqFP2tg97V5bu+A/YLLWclYHBtXXIuCibk6BLj8OHvCogt8ssLDrKDC4R4xBg3JhyfcOSVSnOXmh10ppF7AFq+S8H3XZaDCQoWJvdDbM4d0QZDFyaLp/Lw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738832992; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AjYqtpX63pgaTPOfaEZjZEZvSlOEauKmvVFPv/plYE0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=WpEiugmZ+nxfwTQCKR8fcOOv6Kd78WjTFj3sKI0S5uaPM+qIJfu5skX7w2Uk6xft5aGr34PLToPGFznKFJr5sFZFTcLuW32WoqYBvACJdBQ1BoZGBYpfBw9CE1pSybvjV0Rrbc9Q5vx6IamWMsi+fjXIdzTJ/ZPLtGTDvvcS1tU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=bL/zORBZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="bL/zORBZ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1738832989; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Qu8IUQW+rpqIFEgx58GMOcAE8CbvdH7P/fpdALETQPw=; b=bL/zORBZAQlHrjF9hkPZhttWQu8nDyaW/te7ev+X8jWNCqYzgob8u2//WLx3gBROvQV+QK SH10F80mYkvNRrxIG8sA7aKqwIjT9sZDqR5+wyXdmWhwBT5yvFfXPHZtClvMwtSWqpo4YO AkGh+s+I4CnQuJlJMA3UwAe7BUFISFQ= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-121-xmv9gcftNh6LC_PMbzS0-w-1; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 04:09:46 -0500 X-MC-Unique: xmv9gcftNh6LC_PMbzS0-w-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: xmv9gcftNh6LC_PMbzS0-w Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38db8a516ddso292766f8f.3 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 01:09:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1738832985; x=1739437785; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Qu8IUQW+rpqIFEgx58GMOcAE8CbvdH7P/fpdALETQPw=; b=C8MbKeTc88+k81zKILcJxni7EV1z4fmSbjScg2oE9FU6XFRe6KyYX/B4tcWuXJIpef FpbYw8cWFikYRqs77UT3A/j9GBe34bkfPZ4AW2tMgiCy+yF7pMvjTD2K3gCK8oGcrQbc dYHgojiEdinn7sU8PM3Dob+pjEdQ3AsnKlhDBqlsO+Pmrh5Xfy/XL6XznDL2Vg15l67G ypqD1Qy9HEkn6NpSJQPJDq5Mp7D/m73/gir7QkhyCnc/YaNetz099QWzRiGpKut7x5Gq J8sVQZRavYuZNl9AeAB+109SAzv8nN9GXzH/wUWe6fJfuO3cEiTO8VCH3DGdh6ErWGgQ fqmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzEnkefLbYdlHNQ9dikyrnODT6oDbQmS4lC/gPbIk/0MJpkX0a/ 0eFHE1ra3Ko0KA0Pewv1iOPN5ZWJm70Nttyre0Ew06jokiJ5XgHFX3tWjFg7W8VU4K0ro2j2ZtP 2s2RiIs35eKkpfxv3obE9LYxm6pSe1rl4blIxaP/DNJ86PqFd9znu6Q== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuiqe+oV7ONPDONFkPNSEdT+N99KTQrrdYeflRsKXmTueMUmHLwwv+HuLC5Chz Lh7MWj3pTXkNl5Ea3KRJJ7FHri8x4I6lxZdpLZisnp5IPhgXzT2VedSs4DrJjGn5Xvw+IDMohGq sKfS0gxFoEXc44AKmmMbqI+NQlb0AfKGQq9k8TmUdUocRcNGFCnG4Lohc41MvFokH3OPE01uUcS PxrADH11zqmqos4aTpP+f33ptwm2JTWFkucfKWggTD2jsIcNsThcedoJVJpnj4IEFL5UvpcmWR9 z+MJaPzIh/C47i3FHhnyUfxInso6SGqcDWs= X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef45:0:b0:38c:5c1d:2876 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38db48682aemr3048111f8f.12.1738832985694; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 01:09:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGSmlYj2qFmQhnZ9tEj3FNZcMdAr4v10hQyBba20u5VcBBdssgfzix4Lec1Hi7cuy1DjM2Jw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef45:0:b0:38c:5c1d:2876 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-38db48682aemr3048094f8f.12.1738832985355; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 01:09:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.88.253] (146-241-41-201.dyn.eolo.it. [146.241.41.201]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-38dbde31e09sm1181063f8f.99.2025.02.06.01.09.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Feb 2025 01:09:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <858c9ad5-e585-4c48-8005-edef94909695@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:09:38 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] Support one PTP device per hardware clock To: Tariq Toukan , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Eric Dumazet , Andrew Lunn Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed , Gal Pressman , Jianbo Liu , Moshe Shemesh , Leon Romanovsky , Mark Bloch References: <20250203213516.227902-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> <915e32b0-6868-43fe-9413-91c3732534b0@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Paolo Abeni In-Reply-To: <915e32b0-6868-43fe-9413-91c3732534b0@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/5/25 7:14 AM, Tariq Toukan wrote: > On 03/02/2025 23:35, Tariq Toukan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This series contains two features from Jianbo, followed by simple >> cleanups. >> >> Patches 1-9 by Jianbo add support for one PTP device per hardware clock, >> described below [1]. >> >> Patches 10-12 by Jianbo add support for 200Gbps per-lane link modes in >> kernel and mlx5 driver. >> >> Patches 13-15 are simple cleanups by Gal and Carolina. >> >> Regards, >> Tariq >> > > Hi, > > The series state is marked "Needs ACK" in patchwork. > Which ACK is needed here? From who? I *guess* Dave was waiting for some explicit ack on the ethtool bits. I went over the series: LGTM and the ethtool part looks uncontroversial. I'll apply it soon. /P