From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7854BC43331 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87082072E for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="eaX4Ea3O" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D87082072E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EAD382B; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:38:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 2EAD382B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1585582733; bh=2lAbko2Y67SyLujiNLcxCpnRSuD6Cntd2N90QvcSWtw=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=eaX4Ea3OfvZa1HtCRCU/dheHMqfNGEftNfvouCxh/A80zMjFM5apld8vVh4xtTpTw Oln5wxd4FrMqnGmWWaGpQcT9afvuYHdVwo+jNmHtNcIpxWJTsDxz3SHNwl+0rQRn1k u6DE4JfwPSnediwt/SFGdvpLkJY5ltywUUpEfCfk= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA61F80145; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:38:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id C8A1BF80148; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:37:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 915E3F800AA for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:37:31 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 915E3F800AA IronPort-SDR: RDnvngSgfocgBRttpRhyATgJbD81VUd7LruttyYn85hI8SHHSqXWg6APup1URiGt1F52Nx4o2L lffLnsPGjSfw== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Mar 2020 08:37:21 -0700 IronPort-SDR: rGfofEL0vyso2snjbsChk1/bvhIJvttkOoY8nj2MoiAnlDgt4nwnA7l4+c1eagK7/WENaaEzKM L9ExIccj2JDw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,324,1580803200"; d="scan'208";a="395160763" Received: from sgobriel-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.145.94]) ([10.212.145.94]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2020 08:37:20 -0700 Subject: Re: snd_hda_intel/sst-acpi sound breakage on suspend/resume since 5.6-rc1 To: Mark Brown , Cezary Rojewski References: <20200318192213.GA2987@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <20200318215218.GA2439@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <20200319130049.GA2244@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <20200319134139.GB3983@sirena.org.uk> <20200319165157.GA2254@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <20200330102356.GA16588@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <43c098c9-005e-b9f4-2132-ed6e4a65feee@intel.com> <20200330113929.GF4792@sirena.org.uk> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Message-ID: <85dca962-58ad-6e00-c84b-10859ea127fe@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:37:20 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200330113929.GF4792@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com, curtis@malainey.com, Keyon Jie , tiwai@suse.com, Dominik Brodowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On 3/30/20 6:39 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:10:34PM +0200, Cezary Rojewski wrote: >> On 2020-03-30 12:23, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > >>> Seems this patch didn't make it into v5.6 (and neither did the other ones >>> you sent relating to the "dummy" components). Can these patches therefore be >>> marked for stable, please? > > I sent my pull request already sorry - once it hits Linus' tree I'd send > a request to stable. > >> While one of the series was accepted and merged, there is a delay caused by >> Google/ SOF folks in merging the second one. > >> Idk why rt286 aka "broadwell" machine board patch has not been merged yet. >> It's not like we have to merge all (rt5650 + rt5650 + rt286) patches at >> once. Google guys can keep verifying Buddy or whatnot while guys with Dell >> XPS can enjoy smooth audio experience. > > My scripting is set up to merge things sent to me as a patch series and > we didn't get positive review from Pierre on any of it with the review > on that one patch seeming to suggest it might also be waiting go go > through a test farm. TBH I also wasn't expecting it to take quite so > long to get reviewed when it came in, it's been over 2 weeks now... There are multiple problems with Broadwell and device-specific issues on suspend-resume - in which Cezary is involved. The tests are not automated so depend on people availability. I tested this series last Friday and I didn't find any new problem on my side, so we should probably merge this series. Everyone should be aware though that suspend-resume is far from stable on Broadwell, and if it works on Dell XPS 13 it doesn't work reliably on Chrome devices. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250FAC43331 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D8E2072E for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729403AbgC3Phh (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:37:37 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:59646 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729059AbgC3Phh (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:37:37 -0400 IronPort-SDR: NOuWRtCXOrIUeQjaWe8HTJ7PTNyOBQhdNTbTwLAOPyTASfYCZuuLmkO+IwkOWgD+XepVgvkIkr PrqYtNIdnTlQ== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Mar 2020 08:37:21 -0700 IronPort-SDR: rGfofEL0vyso2snjbsChk1/bvhIJvttkOoY8nj2MoiAnlDgt4nwnA7l4+c1eagK7/WENaaEzKM L9ExIccj2JDw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,324,1580803200"; d="scan'208";a="395160763" Received: from sgobriel-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.145.94]) ([10.212.145.94]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2020 08:37:20 -0700 Subject: Re: snd_hda_intel/sst-acpi sound breakage on suspend/resume since 5.6-rc1 To: Mark Brown , Cezary Rojewski Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com, curtis@malainey.com, tiwai@suse.com, Keyon Jie , Dominik Brodowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com References: <20200318192213.GA2987@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <20200318215218.GA2439@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <20200319130049.GA2244@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <20200319134139.GB3983@sirena.org.uk> <20200319165157.GA2254@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <20200330102356.GA16588@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <43c098c9-005e-b9f4-2132-ed6e4a65feee@intel.com> <20200330113929.GF4792@sirena.org.uk> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Message-ID: <85dca962-58ad-6e00-c84b-10859ea127fe@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:37:20 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200330113929.GF4792@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/30/20 6:39 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:10:34PM +0200, Cezary Rojewski wrote: >> On 2020-03-30 12:23, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > >>> Seems this patch didn't make it into v5.6 (and neither did the other ones >>> you sent relating to the "dummy" components). Can these patches therefore be >>> marked for stable, please? > > I sent my pull request already sorry - once it hits Linus' tree I'd send > a request to stable. > >> While one of the series was accepted and merged, there is a delay caused by >> Google/ SOF folks in merging the second one. > >> Idk why rt286 aka "broadwell" machine board patch has not been merged yet. >> It's not like we have to merge all (rt5650 + rt5650 + rt286) patches at >> once. Google guys can keep verifying Buddy or whatnot while guys with Dell >> XPS can enjoy smooth audio experience. > > My scripting is set up to merge things sent to me as a patch series and > we didn't get positive review from Pierre on any of it with the review > on that one patch seeming to suggest it might also be waiting go go > through a test farm. TBH I also wasn't expecting it to take quite so > long to get reviewed when it came in, it's been over 2 weeks now... There are multiple problems with Broadwell and device-specific issues on suspend-resume - in which Cezary is involved. The tests are not automated so depend on people availability. I tested this series last Friday and I didn't find any new problem on my side, so we should probably merge this series. Everyone should be aware though that suspend-resume is far from stable on Broadwell, and if it works on Dell XPS 13 it doesn't work reliably on Chrome devices.