From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com (mail-wm1-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B923298248; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 12:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.46 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751027007; cv=none; b=iUB8C+ByCh1GKzR4SkgjplOgiOid8miBtIXLDmHJbq49Xbr8xonCZYNu5Hfl6rLoFMnechRkX+1fj028XaMttLqY9sELplt7+kWivRcDVhK7HPkJsl/DS8nxXaEZWPPfb6y/SQzj/L/ImGTH5pgoKEQj6F4bZTIJuepOg3ZNrfU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751027007; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TKE/PcirYgBaEnKVtc6oY0F6itZHLZa+hSxsQ4xJUJ0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=XMyOsNeZyJTrFFitwn69zeJQB9o33GdR+UPfOpRIl5dr8uWhISaZGjY9XoVjBYq3gH6Zayi0egwgSaivKgXMK+ipR5FGZJQhgzUSDJ9z/kOAKl/DR8sQkqrPJgU6DbixynX6KCfwf9VCPUhmiagWx2nYcwdP9uuIbIhNoh+clfU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=iaAia7Bz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.46 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="iaAia7Bz" Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-451d54214adso14705075e9.3; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 05:23:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1751027004; x=1751631804; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8uHDdjuJYEAU1yduIeaRva64ieAw7KTAi6gEOcE+hfA=; b=iaAia7Bz4kXZ0lNWLMftRiRMejO6AFiMgaRJ27Rza3jg11H9wo83qOrV9xnSiIE2R4 6qiHkCRVuZzUVWQRr0FnDtFdI/lcNr+/RexxZBNZol7AeRv+8pIArLPJevNQ5xWnkV8o nKx9hEqS2HsygD656x77jmYVy8vjXvfpNsuxaymqNm49M2aNl22ymiyrPBqoUUYXMIG9 56CFDwjQTTQZ9zo1EsklQ4qB0DBNNBDvh60L4Bb2ErPZewPcbwgZBYGCU7ydV+X76BMk uvmFr6jN0PYwCI78ssgjp0XNJvv4MzCRIjQO2Nl5wvj061C4k5wm2ej6/dSV4byOD75h cVCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1751027004; x=1751631804; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8uHDdjuJYEAU1yduIeaRva64ieAw7KTAi6gEOcE+hfA=; b=MldKRYSIKMJL0uYagKlA0PqyrrbSNKNxzbNfFnq7GkYinzU5tFkniOY0TsGI2cTylj WtWMk4rIXoJ1buJVD+P4eWemWr9d5eJpVI2laHLKbIiB21+oGyrAk299wqtLfjCYUIxL 1eabsqpaUZGwxNraPAfv/LH+1hWe5wACuB792TPVGUV4kLMS4vq7RXkQMGqDe24uPLUp QQqBva2XipLL4mNOHpXpDhNLvRU1w+fQVl3lAYawoARU5F2THi2aNLVDDNeKsoM/r8FM tf3KR2wE3hdhBcfsvR6tM6pHQOjPsBFz55/3tRFuHDle1ue1oYarlls1RqFBKvZFyCu1 7Jfw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUMUfDHrPe/CL4HjtDN9oFFaGKRtlHTDcLoXng4IUEAxRqQNIsx88J3cQodT0UmRTRRsUbdZ/MxthOd7Tyi@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCWEcxt8Nwc3xt2VR2czdi9D6EWPd/G9nnCHKhSVVOPE8bwaV/wECP7mJ66O1yl4CiQ2o9TkoOBTv2I=@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCXFMJ0+kB0kn48Hj1j5XO0ihIQNEODzBuAwkMdIh5/sZtT7fGBPaaQtrNdPyz30vNiaw4XF1+AesTynUtHn@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzo8kp5bE4XVEIwL69QV0Jgthib8KJgcZ6rUh8zonB0WptcXAMu 4d712fMg6xPEbC8f0LfdvtNPdKLRPdjcJjrqUdqnpS7kP2bUJ44xJJRN+BfbX8jL X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuh/j45iMtu9fQARruyzBi9b1R1V8Smv2U4xsyXWzsgPxmw6jFsP4YMzCEaZuy SWFMOQJnjnRFsH8q5eq55DqADfhQlr3qhgAV3GalV1BA297RXZ5oBcrHxoePi956hv3syKDVKcE 0RF76w7HuxvhrT1SlfxekOLBh82/8nQKlPXVfJ6fM5wlGUizXvxa+46uZ4IFKe/WVy6dkc/KHrl u4Mk0r4TZ2LiLOuVhg6juzZBveuRJ0kljmE1ytoy820TVV1uTtIkTQi3aJppDgvQ74sME5o/iFQ hkGV7IB93Y1CCS9M1d69oRRY/0ZZrY7FjblNa3BPiiRxptAzlkgq0n3B7qNdXXfLYE3u4UENdvx eMn+UdWjrSm/VmBT/pBVLFDKYzwY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHHNyiJnortXGltf6dobXUszzMZIiEWCBoSFL/rKagraeF+X9BVsxcCM0pKIkAYOK9PI1rC+A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4446:b0:442:e9eb:cb9e with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4538ee85917mr28872705e9.26.1751027003516; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 05:23:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.170] (5D59A51C.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [93.89.165.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-453823c42e1sm78774495e9.37.2025.06.27.05.23.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Jun 2025 05:23:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <85fa756b-9f18-446e-a50a-2aafaa40744c@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 14:23:22 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] interconnect: avoid memory allocation when 'icc_bw_lock' is held Content-Language: hu To: Johan Hovold Cc: Georgi Djakov , Raviteja Laggyshetty , Johan Hovold , Bryan O'Donoghue , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250625-icc-bw-lockdep-v3-1-2b8f8b8987c4@gmail.com> <84b94649-a248-46b0-a401-772aeb8777a2@gmail.com> <3b90caec-b4c0-47d8-bdd7-1a7abd5e69d9@gmail.com> From: Gabor Juhos In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 2025. 06. 27. 11:43 keltezéssel, Johan Hovold írta: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 11:36:26AM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote: >> 2025. 06. 27. 9:11 keltezéssel, Johan Hovold írta: >>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 05:00:42PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote: > >>>> Despite the note above, your proposal looks good to me. Would you like to >>>> send it as a formal patch, or shall I do it? >>> >>> I can post it in a bit. >> >> Great, just saw the final patch. Thank you! > > Here it is for reference: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250627075854.26943-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org/ > > It looks like Georgi picked up the patch from this thread yesterday, > which should be fine as well as I only changed the commit message > (replacing the ipc splat with one from sc8280xp) before posting it as > v4. Yes, it is fine. I have tested the icc-fixes branch which contains the IPQ9574 specific patch as well. Regards, Gabor