From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55034 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PB2Cf-0002Ig-3U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:21:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PB2Cc-0002ds-77 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:21:53 -0400 Received: from gmplib-02.nada.kth.se ([130.237.222.242]:12431 helo=shell.gmplib.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PB2Cc-0002dY-0i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:21:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Which qemu ports actually work? References: <86sjzssydf.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <8642FB76-3D0B-4326-9C8B-B7ED8802B761@suse.de> <86r5fc22wx.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <86iq0o20lh.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <8662wo112y.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <55EA6A25-A935-4FFE-A610-D40E9E6F787A@suse.de> From: Torbjorn Granlund Sender: tg@gmplib.org Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:21:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55EA6A25-A935-4FFE-A610-D40E9E6F787A@suse.de> (Alexander Graf's message of "Wed\, 27 Oct 2010 01\:51\:25 -0700") Message-ID: <861v7c0z4j.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: qemu-devel Developers Alexander Graf writes: > Device tree strings 0x0000000002450000 -> 0x00000000024504d9 > Device tree struct 0x0000000002451000 -> 0x0000000002453000 > Calling quiesce ... > returning from prom_init >=20 > it hangs. =20=20 It doesn't hang. It tries to display stuff on the graphical screen which you disabled. You need to tell the kernel to use the serial console. =20=20 I take it back and say "it appears to hang to a naive user". I suppose I'll wait until I can find some documentation, such as a simple example from which to start, and stop DOSing your developers' mailing list with my qemu troubles. :-) > If you need performance for this, please just grab a PPC machine and > use KVM on it. It will be a lot faster. >=20 > Physical machines take space and need power. Qemu is a lot leaner. :-) =20=20 *shrug* depends on what you want to do. If you want to actually do *something useful, I'd recommend KVM. You might have different goals than me. Speed is nice, and sometimes critically important. But for my project to get (pseudo) access to lots of more hardware for GNU software testing purposes, speed is not a major issue. Stability, robustness, reproducibility, documentation, are critically important to me. --=20 Torbj=F6rn