From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Subject: Re: [PATCH] git log [diff-tree options]... Date: 10 Apr 2006 17:50:26 -0700 Message-ID: <861ww5aqb1.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <7v7j5zce7x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vbqvabn8f.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <86k69xasg0.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <7vveth6kdg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060411003126.GX27689@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 11 02:50:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FT75g-00074n-LD for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:50:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932207AbWDKAud (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:50:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932212AbWDKAuc (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:50:32 -0400 Received: from blue.stonehenge.com ([209.223.236.162]:39290 "EHLO blue.stonehenge.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932207AbWDKAuc (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:50:32 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE12F8F3A1; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:50:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blue.stonehenge.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (blue.stonehenge.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17179-01; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C8D428F39D; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:50:26 -0700 (PDT) To: Petr Baudis x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.13.3.13; tzolkin = 1 Ben; haab = 6 Pop In-Reply-To: <20060411003126.GX27689@pasky.or.cz> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: >>>>> "Petr" == Petr Baudis writes: Petr> Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 02:12:11AM CEST, I got a letter Petr> where Junio C Hamano said that... >> There is no reason for them to be *absolutely* identical Petr> One is that people expect them to be. It's been implied that "git xyzzy" Petr> is functionally fully equivalent to "git-xyzzy" for too long to silently Petr> break this now. Yes, this is what I was referencing. I would *never* have considered that git-log and "git log" be different things now that it's been firmly engrained that they are the same. Please don't violate the model. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!