From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.85.132.250] (helo=an-out-0708.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HSFme-0003Ej-7M for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:00:06 +0100 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so584236anc for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.177.16 with SMTP id z16mr1723136ane.1174064403008; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cube ( [82.193.98.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 22sm3049119nzn.2007.03.16.09.59.59; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:00:01 +0200 From: Paul Sokolovsky X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <862875582.20070316190001@gmail.com> To: Rolf Leggewie In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: RFC after the fact - bug 1987 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:00:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Rolf, Friday, March 16, 2007, 6:16:34 PM, you wrote: > Hi, > it seems I have still a few things to learn as far as updating OE > metadata goes. Furthermore it seems I might have created the first > major fuck-up. I apologize for the inconvenience this has caused to the > OE community. > Now, to sort things out; I committed > a96c9acac99b5599d2b0fb0a518603646414d166 yesterday to fix bug 1987. It > seemed like an obvious case (move debug files into -dbg package) which > is why I dared to commit. psokolovsky made me aware that an RFC had > been necessary to make this commit to a core part of OE and that it > might have broken compilation for some OE users. > Now here I am trying to do The Right Thing[TM]. I want to discuss "mtn > diff -r e9d53f524190d295cb769c7594711fd76eb197b7 -r > a96c9acac99b5599d2b0fb0a518603646414d166". Please let me know if there > is anything wrong with this change. If it should be reverted, feel free > to do so or let me know via mail or IRC and I will fix it pronto. I doubt that it's due to that easy change. I suspect your earlier commits, 2c516898480b1bc053c9cbf6da853a016059c4c6 & 286930242424d10b2503eb290dbc31c7975bab74 are to blame. Either way, I get here: $bitbake angstrom-x11-image OE Build Configuration: BB_VERSION = "1.6.7" OE_REVISION = "25edfc91e04a9233cb67583981d1d8aa3e82f0c0" TARGET_ARCH = "arm" TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi" MACHINE = "h4000" DISTRO = "angstrom" DISTRO_VERSION = "test-20070316" TARGET_FPU = "soft" NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc not available NOTE: preferred version 2.6.19-hh8 of linux-handhelds-2.6 not available NOTE: preferred version 2.6.19-hh8 of linux-handhelds-2.6 not available NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc-initial not available NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc not available NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc-intermediate not available NOTE: multiple preferred providers are available (glibc, glibc, glibc); NOTE: consider defining only one PREFERRED_PROVIDER to match runtime glibc-gconv-iso8859-1 NOTE: package glibc-2.3.5+cvs20050627: started Whereas: bitbake glibc -v NOTE: Selecting already-staged glibc (2.5-r5) to satisfy glibc (-c rebuild rebuilds 2.5) The same was report by at least 3 other people, including using other distro than Angstrom. > Regards > Rolf -- Best regards, Paul mailto:pmiscml@gmail.com