From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Julian Braha <julianbraha@gmail.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
sudeep.holla@kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org, radu@rendec.net,
vsethi@nvidia.com, sdonthineni@nvidia.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] irqchip: gic-v3: fix unmet dependency on ARM_PSCI_FW
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 18:22:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <864iek1btg.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014123539.2259230-1-julianbraha@gmail.com>
On Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:35:37 +0100,
Julian Braha <julianbraha@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ARM_GIC_V3 currently selects HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY without ensuring its
> dependency, ARM_PSCI_FW, is met.
>
> Patch 1 of this series makes the select conditional on arm64, and patch 2
> adds stubs for arm32.
>
> ---
> Julian Braha (2):
> irqchip: gic-v3: fix unmet dependency on ARM_PSCI_FW
> firmware: smccc: provide stubs when discovery is disabled
>
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 2 +-
> include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
This hasn't been correctly tested, I'm afraid.
The patches are in the wrong order, as applying patch #1 on its own
will break a 32bit ARM build without PSCI (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY
not selected, but the stubs that are supposed to save the day are in
patch #2...):
arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld: drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.o: in function `gic_enable_quirk_nvidia_t241':
/home/maz/hot-poop/arm-platforms/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c:1816:(.text+0xb04): undefined reference to `arm_smccc_get_soc_id_version'
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.vmlinux:72: vmlinux.unstripped] Error 1
make[1]: *** [/home/maz/hot-poop/arm-platforms/Makefile:1387: vmlinux] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
With the patch ordering fixed and the whole thing applied to the same
tree:
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-17 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 12:35 [PATCH v3 0/2] irqchip: gic-v3: fix unmet dependency on ARM_PSCI_FW Julian Braha
2026-10-14 12:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] irqchip: gic-v3: only select HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY on arm64 Julian Braha
2026-10-14 12:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] firmware: smccc: provide stubs when discovery is disabled Julian Braha
2026-10-17 17:22 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=864iek1btg.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=julianbraha@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=radu@rendec.net \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.