From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 08:22:17 +0100
Message-ID: <864lgey2ja.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
References: <20180727215710.zq6gkoqzlb4ca7qv@linutronix.de>
        <1532768831.9882.71.camel@gmx.de>
        <1532847330.1618.8.camel@gmx.de>
        <1532864867.1618.32.camel@gmx.de>
        <1532967899.30205.62.camel@gmx.de>
        <1533061729.12487.26.camel@gmx.de>
        <867elay7he.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
        <1533103345.4735.19.camel@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1533103345.4735.19.camel@gmx.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 07:02:25 +0100,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; ISO-8859-15 (7bit)>]
> On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 06:35 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > 
> > Is it something that is reproducible with the current mainline (non-RT)?
> 
> These waters are a bit muddy, it's config dependent.  I'm trying to
> generate a reproducing !RT config for -rc7 as we speak.  If I build
> openSUSE/master-default, it does NOT reproduce.  That with the bisect
> config just finished building, and.... yup, it reproduced
> (attached).

Thanks for that.

> 
> Every RT tree 4.16..master.today reproduces, and is fixed up (modulo
> the RT specific failure) by reverting the fingered commit.
> 
> > Pretty worrying. What HW is that on?
> 
> Box is a 4 node/64 core TaiShan 2280.

Is that what is also known as D05/HIP07, with 64 Cortex-A72? If so, I
think we have one somewhere... I'll try to reproduce it once I'm back
into the office (things seem to run just fine on my A72-based laptop,
so it definitely smells of being config dependent).

Cheers,

	M.

-- 
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.