All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yhlu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
	Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>,
	akpm@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Fix apicid versus cpu# confusion.
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:51:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c4405081122513625c081@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1hddvwzke.fsf_-_@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>

So boot_cpu_id is apic id of BSP.

Anyway sync_tsc(...) there is master and MASTER..., but value are all 0.

YH

On 8/11/05, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> Ok being impatient not wanting this tiny bug to be forgotten for
> 2.6.13.  Linus please apply this micro patch.
> 
> > >  static void __cpuinit tsc_sync_wait(void)
> > >  {
> > >     if (notscsync || !cpu_has_tsc)
> > >             return;
> > > - printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d: Syncing TSC to CPU %u.\n", smp_processor_id(),
> > > -                   boot_cpu_id);
> > > -   sync_tsc();
> > > +   sync_tsc(boot_cpu_id);
> >
> > I actually found a bug in this today. This should be sync_tsc(0), not
> > sync_tsc(boot_cpu_id)
> > Can you just fix it in your tree or should I submit a new patch?
> >
> > -Andi
> 
> Oops.  I knew I didn't have the physical versus logical cpu identifiers right
> when I generated that patch.  It's not nearly as bad as I feared at the time
> though.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> ---
> 
>  arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> 5192895f71c7eff7e1335cd9d6a775dda2bb5d52
> diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c
> --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static void __cpuinit tsc_sync_wait(void
>  {
>         if (notscsync || !cpu_has_tsc)
>                 return;
> -       sync_tsc(boot_cpu_id);
> +       sync_tsc(0);
>  }
> 
>  static __init int notscsync_setup(char *s)
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-12  5:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-11 22:54 [patch 0/8] -stable review Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 1/8] [PATCH] sys_set_mempolicy() doesnt check if mode < 0 Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 2/8] [PATCH] Fix SRAT for non dual core AMD systems Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 3/8] [PATCH] x86_64: Fixing smpboot timing problem Chris Wright
2005-08-11 23:33   ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-11 23:43     ` Chris Wright
2005-08-12  2:32       ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-08-12  4:26     ` [PATCH] x86_64: Fix apicid versus cpu# confusion Eric W. Biederman
2005-08-12  5:51       ` yhlu [this message]
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 4/8] [PATCH] Update in-kernel zlib routines Chris Wright
2005-08-12  0:01   ` Peter Osterlund
2005-08-12  0:11     ` Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 5/8] Check input buffer size in zisofs Chris Wright
2005-08-12  1:12   ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-12  1:16     ` Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 6/8] CAN-2005-2098 Error during attempt to join key management session can leave semaphore pinned Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 7/8] CAN-2005-2099 Destruction of failed keyring oopses Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 8/8] [PATCH] Module per-cpu alignment cannot always be met Chris Wright
2005-08-22  6:58   ` Denis Vlasenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86802c4405081122513625c081@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=chuckw@quantumlinux.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jmforbes@linuxtx.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.