From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758284AbYDUDP7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:15:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754436AbYDUDPv (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:15:51 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.29]:63228 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754414AbYDUDPu (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:15:50 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YDCJ72c2dvV8YUwzXuR+IJUxvCrMX+1LGPmIrgAuDaQPBJ7PatsmdncvWS2t5+2IDszvYK3BiA4vTdjQ1lUV3vXFF7t+HTltmWz/zD10hvWQgosJluEXp8ieVWW445d717ss/0BC9yMqrWsBmoHOQgPN6c/vHYymD32sQsxnoWA= Message-ID: <86802c440804202015h2605eff7vc733874dd1f22261@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:15:40 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "Mitch Bradley" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OLPC: Add support for calling into Open Firmware Cc: "Andres Salomon" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Andrew Morton" , "Joseph Fannin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jordan.crouse@amd.com In-Reply-To: <480C0582.9010509@firmworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080418014757.52fb4a4f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080419031024.GC3503@nineveh.local> <20080418202925.b18452c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080419092544.378664a8@ephemeral> <20080419133909.5aa6b63e@ephemeral> <86802c440804200334t5cdcd100rfc41e9b1bf379109@mail.gmail.com> <480C0582.9010509@firmworks.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote: > > > > Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > > > how about changing to ofw_32.c? > > > > YH > > > > > > Is your suggestion to change the filename from "ofw.c" to "ofw_32.c"? That > seems like a good idea to me. Yes. BTW, why olpc need OFW runtime service? why not just put the info in in ram with some signiture, so kernel/util just need to loot at the table if needed? YH