All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Radu Rendec <radu@rendec.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] irqchip/gic-v3: validate MADT records before use
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 15:36:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <868q3x1zlp.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016141357.2793046-4-yaojiale02@163.com>

On Fri, 16 Oct 2026 15:13:54 +0100,
Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com> wrote:
> 
> The GICv3 ACPI paths cast generic MADT headers to distributor,
> redistributor, and CPU interface records before confirming that the
> corresponding fixed-size structures are present. Truncated records can
> therefore cause out-of-bounds field reads while probing or setting up
> virtualization data.
>
> Check each typed MADT record before its first field access. Also reject
> a short distributor record in the version validator, which runs before
> the probe callback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> index 6e1fa5b247fc..0588d6d83b31 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> @@ -2299,6 +2299,9 @@ gic_acpi_parse_madt_redist(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
>  			(struct acpi_madt_generic_redistributor *)header;
>  	void __iomem *redist_base;
>  
> +	if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(redist, end))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	redist_base = ioremap(redist->base_address, redist->length);
>  	if (!redist_base) {
>  		pr_err("Couldn't map GICR region @%llx\n", redist->base_address);
> @@ -2325,6 +2328,9 @@ gic_acpi_parse_madt_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
>  	u32 size = reg == GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_GICv4 ? SZ_64K * 4 : SZ_64K * 2;
>  	void __iomem *redist_base;
>  
> +	if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(gicc, end))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	/* Neither enabled or online capable means it doesn't exist, skip it */
>  	if (!(gicc->flags & (ACPI_MADT_ENABLED | ACPI_MADT_GICC_ONLINE_CAPABLE)))
>  		return 0;
> @@ -2391,6 +2397,9 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_match_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
>  	struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc =
>  				(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header;
>  
> +	if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(gicc, end))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If GICC is enabled and has valid gicr base address, then it means
>  	 * GICR base is presented via GICC. The redistributor is only known to
> @@ -2437,6 +2446,9 @@ static bool __init acpi_validate_gic_table(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>  	int count;
>  
>  	dist = (struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *)header;
> +	if (header->length < sizeof(*dist))
> +		return false;
> +

Why is this open-coded instead of using the checking macro?

>  	if (dist->version != ape->driver_data)
>  		return false;
>  
> @@ -2457,6 +2469,9 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *hea
>  	int maint_irq_mode;
>  	static int first_madt = true;
>  
> +	if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(gicc, end))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +

Why isn't this using BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY()?

>  	if (!(gicc->flags &
>  	      (ACPI_MADT_ENABLED | ACPI_MADT_GICC_ONLINE_CAPABLE)))
>  		return 0;
> @@ -2547,6 +2562,9 @@ gic_acpi_init(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const unsigned long end)
>  
>  	/* Get distributor base address */
>  	dist = (struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *)header;
> +	if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(dist, end))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +

Why does this need to be re-checked if the validation phased has succeeded?

>  	acpi_data.dist_base = ioremap(dist->base_address,
>  				      ACPI_GICV3_DIST_MEM_SIZE);
>  	if (!acpi_data.dist_base) {

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-16 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-16 14:13 [PATCH 0/6] irqchip: validate ACPI MADT entries before use Jiale Yao
2026-10-16 14:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] ACPI: irqchip: validate MADT entry bounds before probing Jiale Yao
2026-10-16 14:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] irqchip/gic-v3-its: validate MADT ITS entries Jiale Yao
2026-10-16 14:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] irqchip/gic-v3: validate MADT records before use Jiale Yao
2026-10-16 14:36   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-10-16 14:52     ` jiale yao
2026-10-16 14:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] irqchip/gic-v5-its: validate MADT translate frames Jiale Yao
2026-10-16 14:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] irqchip/loongarch-cpu: validate MADT LIO-PIC entries Jiale Yao
2026-10-16 14:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] irqchip/loongson-eiointc: validate MADT BIO-PIC entries Jiale Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=868q3x1zlp.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=radu@rendec.net \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=yaojiale02@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.