From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38586 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PAqns-0003OX-DO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:11:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tg@gmplib.org>) id 1PAqnp-0004Ge-IU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:11:32 -0400
Received: from gmplib-02.nada.kth.se ([130.237.222.242]:25248
	helo=shell.gmplib.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tg@gmplib.org>) id 1PAqnp-0004GC-BU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:11:29 -0400
References: <86sjzssydf.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>
	<4CC715B7.6090100@mail.berlios.de> <86mxq022fm.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>
	<4CC72D80.3000606@redhat.com> <86eibc1zvk.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>
	<4CC73FFC.8070709@mail.berlios.de>
From: Torbjorn Granlund <tg@gmplib.org>
Sender: tg@gmplib.org
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:11:27 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4CC73FFC.8070709@mail.berlios.de> (Stefan Weil's message of
	"Tue\, 26 Oct 2010 22\:54\:20 +0200")
Message-ID: <86aam01wxs.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Which qemu ports actually work?
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> writes:

  No, you need newer version of qemu, for example version 0.13.0
=20=20
That's the version I am using:

king# qemu -version
QEMU emulator version 0.13.0, Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard

  kqemu was replaced by kvm support (at least for some platforms).
=20=20
Are you talking about the FreeBSD kernel now and not the kernel Linux?

(I have a poor understanding of what the various components do, such as
kqemu and kvm.  Is there a good, accurate and quite detailed text about
this, that I could read?)

  As far as I know, there should be kvm support for FreeBSD, too,
  but I must admit that I rarely use kvm: for most guests
  which you listed neither kqemu nor kvm will be useable.
  Both only improve host architecture =3D guest architecture
  scenarios.

I realise that.

--=20
Torbj=F6rn