* [PATCH] irqchip: gic-v3: Handle failure case of CPU enters low power state @ 2022-12-22 18:35 Yogesh Lal 2022-12-27 10:36 ` Pavan Kondeti 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Yogesh Lal @ 2022-12-22 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tglx, maz, linux-kernel; +Cc: linux-arm-msm, Yogesh Lal When CPU enter in low power mode it disable the redistributor and Group1 interrupts. And re-initialise the system registers on wakeup. But in case of failure to enter low power mode need to enable the redistributor and Group1 interrupts. Signed-off-by: Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@quicinc.com> --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c index 997104d..4904f00 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c @@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ static int gic_retrigger(struct irq_data *data) static int gic_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *v) { - if (cmd == CPU_PM_EXIT) { + if (cmd == CPU_PM_EXIT || cmd == CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED) { if (gic_dist_security_disabled()) gic_enable_redist(true); gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(); -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic-v3: Handle failure case of CPU enters low power state 2022-12-22 18:35 [PATCH] irqchip: gic-v3: Handle failure case of CPU enters low power state Yogesh Lal @ 2022-12-27 10:36 ` Pavan Kondeti 2022-12-28 11:14 ` Marc Zyngier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Pavan Kondeti @ 2022-12-27 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yogesh Lal; +Cc: tglx, maz, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm Hi Yogesh, On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 12:05:40AM +0530, Yogesh Lal wrote: > When CPU enter in low power mode it disable the redistributor and > Group1 interrupts. And re-initialise the system registers on wakeup. > > But in case of failure to enter low power mode need to enable > the redistributor and Group1 interrupts. > > Signed-off-by: Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > index 997104d..4904f00 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > @@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ static int gic_retrigger(struct irq_data *data) > static int gic_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, > unsigned long cmd, void *v) > { > - if (cmd == CPU_PM_EXIT) { > + if (cmd == CPU_PM_EXIT || cmd == CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED) { > if (gic_dist_security_disabled()) > gic_enable_redist(true); > gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(); static int gic_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *v) { if (cmd == CPU_PM_EXIT) { if (gic_dist_security_disabled()) gic_enable_redist(true); gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(); } else if (cmd == CPU_PM_ENTER && gic_dist_security_disabled()) { gic_write_grpen1(0); gic_enable_redist(false); } return NOTIFY_OK; } During CPU_PM_ENTER notification, we are not doing anything for the !gic_dist_security_disabled() case. Since CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED notification arrive when CPU fails to power down, do we need to reinitialize the system registers? IOW, should we do different handling for CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED based on gic_dist_security_disabled()? Thanks, Pavan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic-v3: Handle failure case of CPU enters low power state 2022-12-27 10:36 ` Pavan Kondeti @ 2022-12-28 11:14 ` Marc Zyngier 2022-12-28 11:20 ` Pavan Kondeti 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Marc Zyngier @ 2022-12-28 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavan Kondeti; +Cc: Yogesh Lal, tglx, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:36:38 +0000, Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com> wrote: > > Hi Yogesh, > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 12:05:40AM +0530, Yogesh Lal wrote: > > When CPU enter in low power mode it disable the redistributor and > > Group1 interrupts. And re-initialise the system registers on wakeup. > > > > But in case of failure to enter low power mode need to enable > > the redistributor and Group1 interrupts. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@quicinc.com> > > --- > > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > > index 997104d..4904f00 100644 > > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > > @@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ static int gic_retrigger(struct irq_data *data) > > static int gic_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, > > unsigned long cmd, void *v) > > { > > - if (cmd == CPU_PM_EXIT) { > > + if (cmd == CPU_PM_EXIT || cmd == CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED) { > > if (gic_dist_security_disabled()) > > gic_enable_redist(true); > > gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(); > > static int gic_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, > unsigned long cmd, void *v) > { > if (cmd == CPU_PM_EXIT) { > if (gic_dist_security_disabled()) > gic_enable_redist(true); > gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(); > } else if (cmd == CPU_PM_ENTER && gic_dist_security_disabled()) { > gic_write_grpen1(0); > gic_enable_redist(false); > } > return NOTIFY_OK; > } > > During CPU_PM_ENTER notification, we are not doing anything for the > !gic_dist_security_disabled() case. Since CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED notification > arrive when CPU fails to power down, do we need to reinitialize the > system registers? IOW, should we do different handling for CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED > based on gic_dist_security_disabled()? What does it gain you apart from the extra complexity? gic_cpu_sys_reg_init() does very little, and makes sure we're always back into a sane state. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic-v3: Handle failure case of CPU enters low power state 2022-12-28 11:14 ` Marc Zyngier @ 2022-12-28 11:20 ` Pavan Kondeti 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Pavan Kondeti @ 2022-12-28 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Zyngier; +Cc: Pavan Kondeti, Yogesh Lal, tglx, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 11:14:11AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:36:38 +0000, > Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Yogesh, > > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 12:05:40AM +0530, Yogesh Lal wrote: > > > When CPU enter in low power mode it disable the redistributor and > > > Group1 interrupts. And re-initialise the system registers on wakeup. > > > > > > But in case of failure to enter low power mode need to enable > > > the redistributor and Group1 interrupts. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@quicinc.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > > > index 997104d..4904f00 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > > > @@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ static int gic_retrigger(struct irq_data *data) > > > static int gic_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, > > > unsigned long cmd, void *v) > > > { > > > - if (cmd == CPU_PM_EXIT) { > > > + if (cmd == CPU_PM_EXIT || cmd == CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED) { > > > if (gic_dist_security_disabled()) > > > gic_enable_redist(true); > > > gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(); > > > > static int gic_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, > > unsigned long cmd, void *v) > > { > > if (cmd == CPU_PM_EXIT) { > > if (gic_dist_security_disabled()) > > gic_enable_redist(true); > > gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(); > > } else if (cmd == CPU_PM_ENTER && gic_dist_security_disabled()) { > > gic_write_grpen1(0); > > gic_enable_redist(false); > > } > > return NOTIFY_OK; > > } > > > > During CPU_PM_ENTER notification, we are not doing anything for the > > !gic_dist_security_disabled() case. Since CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED notification > > arrive when CPU fails to power down, do we need to reinitialize the > > system registers? IOW, should we do different handling for CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED > > based on gic_dist_security_disabled()? > > What does it gain you apart from the extra complexity? > Probably nothing. I am not very familiar with this part of code. If gic_cpu_sys_reg_init() is written in such a way that it can be called even when the CPU is not powered down, there is nothing to worry. The additional complexity of dealing CPU_PM_EXIT vs CPU_PM_ENTER is pointless. > gic_cpu_sys_reg_init() does very little, and makes sure we're always > back into a sane state. > Understood. Thanks for taking a look. Thanks, Pavan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-28 11:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-12-22 18:35 [PATCH] irqchip: gic-v3: Handle failure case of CPU enters low power state Yogesh Lal 2022-12-27 10:36 ` Pavan Kondeti 2022-12-28 11:14 ` Marc Zyngier 2022-12-28 11:20 ` Pavan Kondeti
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.