From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Subject: Re: recent change in git.git/master broke my repos Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:58:52 -0700 Message-ID: <86bqan6v9f.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <86oden6z97.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20071025155142.GB19655@coredump.intra.peff.net> <86fxzz6vfh.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20071025155712.GA21446@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 25 17:59:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Il56v-0006pX-Tr for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:59:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751858AbXJYP6x (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:58:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751684AbXJYP6x (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:58:53 -0400 Received: from blue.stonehenge.com ([209.223.236.162]:47070 "EHLO blue.stonehenge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751277AbXJYP6w (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:58:52 -0400 Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 921EF1DE3CD; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:58:52 -0700 (PDT) x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.14.13.16; tzolkin = 5 Cib; haab = 4 Zac In-Reply-To: <20071025155712.GA21446@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:57:12 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (berkeley-unix) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff King writes: Jeff> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:55:14AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >> It's probably due to this: >> >> [remote "origin"] >> url = [obscured] >> fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* >> >> fetch wants to sync my heads with the origin heads. But yes, it's >> definitely the fetch that fails under today's version, and not >> under yesterday's version. Jeff> So that should take the remote's refs/heads/* and put them in your Jeff> refs/remotes/origin/*. I don't see how that would have anything to do Jeff> with your 'refs/heads/upstream' branch. Agreed, but that's the place where fetch might look at refs/heads/upstream, and the behavior is definitely different between yesterday and today. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!