All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com,
	song@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, clm@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Better build_id caching in stack_map_get_build_id_offset()
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:59:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86f85bd8-e950-401f-945a-b3cb8b3abc34@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9a5887f90f678d4fbbb021bd603652762132041a16f93a84a99f3607195ebb1@mail.kernel.org>

On 6/12/26 3:37 PM, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> index 77ba03216c09..822b5cb188ea 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> @@ -343,8 +410,8 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
>>  	struct mmap_unlock_irq_work *work = NULL;
>>  	bool irq_work_busy = bpf_mmap_unlock_get_irq_work(&work);
>>  	bool has_user_ctx = user && current && current->mm;
>> -	struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev_vma = NULL;
>> -	const unsigned char *prev_build_id = NULL;
>> +	struct stack_map_build_id_cache cache = {};
>> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>>  	int i;
>>
>>  	if (may_fault && has_user_ctx) {
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> @@ -365,27 +432,29 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
>>
>>  	for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
>>  		u64 ip = READ_ONCE(id_offs[i].ip);
>> -		u64 offset;
>>
>> -		if (prev_build_id && range_in_vma(prev_vma, ip, ip)) {
>> -			vma = prev_vma;
>> -			offset = stack_map_build_id_offset(vma->vm_pgoff, vma->vm_start, ip);
>> -			stack_map_build_id_set_valid(&id_offs[i], offset, prev_build_id);
>> +		if (!stack_map_build_id_set_from_cache(&cache, &id_offs[i], ip))
>>  			continue;
>> -		}
>> +
>>  		vma = find_vma(current->mm, ip);
>>  		if (!vma || vma_is_anonymous(vma) ||
>>  		    fetch_build_id(vma, id_offs[i].build_id, may_fault)) {
>> -			/* per entry fall back to ips */
>> +			/* per entry fall back to ips; cache build-ID-less range */
>>  			stack_map_build_id_set_ip(&id_offs[i]);
>> -			prev_vma = vma;
>> -			prev_build_id = NULL;
>> +			if (vma)
>> +				stack_map_build_id_cache_set_unresolved(&cache,
>> +						vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end);
>>  			continue;
>>  		}
>> -		offset = stack_map_build_id_offset(vma->vm_pgoff, vma->vm_start, ip);
>> -		stack_map_build_id_set_valid(&id_offs[i], offset, id_offs[i].build_id);
>> -		prev_vma = vma;
>> -		prev_build_id = id_offs[i].build_id;
>> +		/* mmap_lock is held for the whole loop, so the cached VMA
>> +		 * fields stay valid; no file pinning is needed here.
>> +		 */
>                 ^^^^
> 
> This isn't a bug, but should the comment text start on the line after the
> opening /* to match the BPF multi-line comment style?

sigh... Looks like this also was present in v1, and I missed it.

I'll wait in case there is more feedback before making a v3.

> 
> The other multi-line comments added in this patch follow that convention,
> such as in the new stack_map_build_id_cache structure and the helper
> functions.
> 
>> +		stack_map_build_id_set_valid(&id_offs[i],
>> +			stack_map_build_id_offset(vma->vm_pgoff, vma->vm_start, ip),
>> +			id_offs[i].build_id);
>> +		stack_map_build_id_cache_set_resolved(&cache, NULL, id_offs[i].build_id,
>> +						      vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end,
>> +						      vma->vm_pgoff);
>>  	}
>>  	bpf_mmap_unlock_mm(work, current->mm);
>>  }
> 
> 
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
> 
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/27446103592


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-12 23:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12 22:06 [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Better build_id caching in stack_map_get_build_id_offset() Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-12 22:37 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-12 23:59   ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
2026-06-13  1:45 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-13  4:38   ` Ihor Solodrai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86f85bd8-e950-401f-945a-b3cb8b3abc34@linux.dev \
    --to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.