From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kjetil Barvik Subject: Re: [PATCH] check_updates(): effective removal of cache entries marked CE_REMOVE Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:15:27 +0100 Organization: private Message-ID: <86iqn5ifcw.fsf@broadpark.no> References: <1234995483-933-1-git-send-email-barvik@broadpark.no> <7vskm9ftcq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <86vdr5iis0.fsf@broadpark.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 20 11:18:15 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LaSSR-0003zr-RZ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:18:12 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754051AbZBTKPe (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:15:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752985AbZBTKPc (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:15:32 -0500 Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.58]:38497 "EHLO osl1smout1.broadpark.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752614AbZBTKPa (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:15:30 -0500 Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-3.01 (built Jul 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KFD001CK0HSD680@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:15:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([84.48.79.78]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-3.01 (built Jul 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KFD009L50HRTM00@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:15:28 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Hi, > > On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Kjetil Barvik wrote: > >> I guess that 77 milliseconds compared to 15 seconds is not noticable > > I guess you meant 15 milliseconds? ;-) Ok, I guess I was thinkning abouth the 77 milliseconds reduction of the total time this git chekcout' test take, and the total time is 15 seconds. -- kjetil, :-)