From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/lvds: Always use the presence pin
	for LVDS on PCH
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:23:37 -0800
Message-ID: <86k43vdfx2.fsf@sumi.keithp.com>
References: <1328780153-3945-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<86pqdoc4lc.fsf@sumi.keithp.com>
	<aefc95$34r1in@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from keithp.com (home.keithp.com [63.227.221.253])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576C49E9C6
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu,  9 Feb 2012 10:23:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <aefc95$34r1in@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

<#part sign=pgpmime>
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:33:23 +0000, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> That code already existed in intel_lvds_init():
>   if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
>      if (I915_READ(PCH_LVDS) & LVDS_DETECTED) == 0)
>         return false
>      ...
>   }

Tricky. Do we have any idea how reliable this pin is? We've had such bad
luck in the past...

-- 
keith.packard@intel.com