From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Subject: Re: [PATCH] git log [diff-tree options]... Date: 10 Apr 2006 17:04:15 -0700 Message-ID: <86k69xasg0.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <7v7j5zce7x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vbqvabn8f.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 11 02:04:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FT6Ml-0003rO-Ff for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:04:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932235AbWDKAER (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:04:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932240AbWDKAER (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:04:17 -0400 Received: from blue.stonehenge.com ([209.223.236.162]:25997 "EHLO blue.stonehenge.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932235AbWDKAEQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:04:16 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355B68EA71; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blue.stonehenge.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (blue.stonehenge.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11174-02-5; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:04:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BA2608F344; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:04:15 -0700 (PDT) To: Johannes Schindelin x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.13.3.13; tzolkin = 1 Ben; haab = 6 Pop In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: >>>>> "Johannes" == Johannes Schindelin writes: Johannes> Hi, Johannes> On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> - keep it - for historical reasons - as a internal shorthand, and just >> turn it into "git log --diff -cc" Johannes> It is "git log --cc", right? And BTW, I was burnt by the difference of Johannes> "git-log" and "git log" this time. "git-log" does not understand "--cc". Johannes> Could we kill "git-log", please? Wait. Why is there a git log and a git-log? Shouldn't those be *absolutely* identical? Or have we now finally diverged, violating rules that were established earlier? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!