From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Packard Subject: Re: Scanline wait hack for IVB Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:26:05 -0700 Message-ID: <86mx6xaa5e.fsf@sumi.keithp.com> References: <20120330133017.2e7594da@jbarnes-desktop> <20120330144516.39cb62b0@jbarnes-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from keithp.com (home.keithp.com [63.227.221.253]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6020C9EFD5 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:26:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120330144516.39cb62b0@jbarnes-desktop> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Jesse Barnes Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org <#part sign=pgpmime> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:45:16 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > So it looks like we can't use this on the BLT ring in SNB or IVB. So > we'll need a render ring BLT routine to use here instead (hello SNA). Or a semaphore to block the render ring? -- keith.packard@intel.com