From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B548C2BB85 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E922137B for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UiRa/RX4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E4E922137B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6D34B221; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:24:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@kernel.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kqnYPeyPX5D9; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BF94B1D0; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972E34B18C for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:24:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qedhmV1AejLL for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:24:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A92C4B16D for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:24:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64B6B20857; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:23:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586597039; bh=K90rgXY4TWpAkIW5KZCWi0jhW+x/kY4ZiXFZIllEs2M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UiRa/RX4NHEViHO5ccU94Pb69h0ReC90LoUClRg83c7t3C5hRykS+47XYO75Io4iL QowIYv6pUSwZ5qUkJdmhOPyV1IDkAsBcy5+insjLhJ28goWRSy0QiJvnhrG/UROtyv vKHPVASCOiu14AB3sTGI3i0R3Kc7Zvyi/OZT4fZg= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=big-swifty.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNCMn-002LiR-Nk; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:23:57 +0100 Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:23:56 +0100 Message-ID: <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: "Zengtao (B)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <06d08f904f003160a48eac3c5ab3c7ff@kernel.org> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/26 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: prime.zeng@hisilicon.com, gcherian@marvell.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, jintack@cs.columbia.edu, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, areddy3@marvell.com, gkulkarni@marvell.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "andre.przywara@arm.com" , George Cherian , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Anil Kumar Reddy H , "Dave.Martin@arm.com" X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Hi Zengtao, On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100, "Zengtao (B)" wrote: > > Hi Marc: > > Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform > which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series > affects the existed virtualization functions or not. > > Any suggestion about the test focus? Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81434C2BA2B for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5264D20857 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="dAyPP1e5"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UiRa/RX4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5264D20857 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=uffGn4+7eP2sc0kL2TKihHiylbWjiEN4sjqjHFxN6vI=; b=dAyPP1e5kn+/o8 qyHzP3lErPIyG0W7R51QgGS/DyidDEUn4R/ImvQ2m9B4q6CHtRB1yjUh6cDr4STktkKeUkaa0mOV7 gSBK2ZOBamPqikFS72UWYbpgdWGMv3YncZeZMsFlz7/MJaJHEuEZaAz3d3YOTXX2XOmMMre5iE6uP ETZTlwimDkY5H41yTKTFjnnGrbmFRZ+oIc59EPPM2rZ/7nNngChQ6p1a8MF9XeiMwcjtAHI+G7scE zPBwTUWWkNbUJTKDI7BLQCIgovXPAtjeXvSOPtEoF3zunnTs6K/HINnT1t2+vEPqAais7pxscBp8v kQLCGyqnFR93ZXVaCo0Q==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jNCMs-0007d1-O5; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:24:02 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jNCMq-0007cb-4t for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:24:01 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64B6B20857; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:23:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586597039; bh=K90rgXY4TWpAkIW5KZCWi0jhW+x/kY4ZiXFZIllEs2M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UiRa/RX4NHEViHO5ccU94Pb69h0ReC90LoUClRg83c7t3C5hRykS+47XYO75Io4iL QowIYv6pUSwZ5qUkJdmhOPyV1IDkAsBcy5+insjLhJ28goWRSy0QiJvnhrG/UROtyv vKHPVASCOiu14AB3sTGI3i0R3Kc7Zvyi/OZT4fZg= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=big-swifty.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNCMn-002LiR-Nk; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:23:57 +0100 Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:23:56 +0100 Message-ID: <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: "Zengtao (B)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <06d08f904f003160a48eac3c5ab3c7ff@kernel.org> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/26 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: prime.zeng@hisilicon.com, gcherian@marvell.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, jintack@cs.columbia.edu, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, areddy3@marvell.com, gkulkarni@marvell.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200411_022400_210630_0F104F97 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.36 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "suzuki.poulose@arm.com" , "andre.przywara@arm.com" , "christoffer.dall@arm.com" , "jintack@cs.columbia.edu" , George Cherian , "james.morse@arm.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Anil Kumar Reddy H , "alexandru.elisei@arm.com" , "Dave.Martin@arm.com" , "julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Zengtao, On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100, "Zengtao (B)" wrote: > > Hi Marc: > > Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform > which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series > affects the existed virtualization functions or not. > > Any suggestion about the test focus? Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8856FC2BA2B for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F298212CC for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:24:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586597041; bh=K90rgXY4TWpAkIW5KZCWi0jhW+x/kY4ZiXFZIllEs2M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=XZ3yc25s3H5kprcbauXU3rMEzdjvW7PBmTQ5szfaLuQ1etPQRmGfVi4/o4vP5dBd9 c2ov0lLp4F74nbRorqkCtRJZtLOORXisED5H6Fve5XXqZ6f592nNu6154nUwT9lmv/ KWo/Z0u8uLD3R/rLQ1vuRDMSaAiFc44vVIPD7Y0g= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725935AbgDKJX7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:23:59 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56056 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725905AbgDKJX7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:23:59 -0400 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64B6B20857; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:23:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586597039; bh=K90rgXY4TWpAkIW5KZCWi0jhW+x/kY4ZiXFZIllEs2M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UiRa/RX4NHEViHO5ccU94Pb69h0ReC90LoUClRg83c7t3C5hRykS+47XYO75Io4iL QowIYv6pUSwZ5qUkJdmhOPyV1IDkAsBcy5+insjLhJ28goWRSy0QiJvnhrG/UROtyv vKHPVASCOiu14AB3sTGI3i0R3Kc7Zvyi/OZT4fZg= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=big-swifty.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNCMn-002LiR-Nk; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:23:57 +0100 Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:23:56 +0100 Message-ID: <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: "Zengtao (B)" Cc: George Cherian , "Dave.Martin@arm.com" , "alexandru.elisei@arm.com" , "andre.przywara@arm.com" , "christoffer.dall@arm.com" , "james.morse@arm.com" , "jintack@cs.columbia.edu" , "julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "suzuki.poulose@arm.com" , Anil Kumar Reddy H , Ganapatrao Kulkarni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <06d08f904f003160a48eac3c5ab3c7ff@kernel.org> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/26 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: prime.zeng@hisilicon.com, gcherian@marvell.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, jintack@cs.columbia.edu, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, areddy3@marvell.com, gkulkarni@marvell.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi Zengtao, On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100, "Zengtao (B)" wrote: > > Hi Marc: > > Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform > which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series > affects the existed virtualization functions or not. > > Any suggestion about the test focus? Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.