From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org, graf@amazon.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pratyush@kernel.org,
ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] kho: validate preserved memory map during population
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:11:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86y0mtb855.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251223140140.2090337-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> (Pasha Tatashin's message of "Tue, 23 Dec 2025 09:01:40 -0500")
On Tue, Dec 23 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> If the previous kernel enabled KHO but did not call kho_finalize()
> (e.g., CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE=n or userspace skipped the finalization step),
> the 'preserved-memory-map' property in the FDT remains empty/zero.
>
> Previously, kho_populate() would succeed regardless of the memory map's
> state, reserving the incoming scratch regions in memblock. However,
> kho_memory_init() would later fail to deserialize the empty map. By that
> time, the scratch regions were already registered, leading to partial
> initialization and subsequent list corruption (freeing scratch area
> twice) during kho_init().
>
> Move the validation of the preserved memory map earlier into
> kho_populate(). If the memory map is empty/NULL:
> 1. Abort kho_populate() immediately with -ENOENT.
> 2. Do not register or reserve the incoming scratch memory, allowing the new
> kernel to reclaim those pages as standard free memory.
> 3. Leave the global 'kho_in' state uninitialized.
>
> Consequently, kho_memory_init() sees no active KHO context
> (kho_in.mem_chunks_phys is 0) and falls back to kho_reserve_scratch(),
> allocating fresh scratch memory as if it were a standard cold boot.
>
> Fixes: de51999e687c ("kho: allow memory preservation state updates after finalization")
> Reported-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251218215613.GA17304@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-23 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-23 14:01 [PATCH v4] kho: validate preserved memory map during population Pasha Tatashin
2025-12-23 14:11 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2026-01-08 18:03 ` Breno Leitao
2026-01-16 16:21 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-01-18 6:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-01-20 15:11 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-01-19 18:54 ` Breno Leitao
2026-01-20 15:10 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-01-19 7:04 ` Zhu Yanjun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86y0mtb855.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.