All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sascha Bischoff <Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	"oliver.upton@linux.dev" <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Joey Gouly <Joey.Gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
	"yuzenghui@huawei.com" <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	"peter.maydell@linaro.org" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"lpieralisi@kernel.org" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Timothy Hayes <Timothy.Hayes@arm.com>,
	"jonathan.cameron@huawei.com" <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 20/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Init Private IRQs (PPIs) for GICv5
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 14:21:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86zf4n7k1a.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260226155515.1164292-21-sascha.bischoff@arm.com>

On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 16:00:36 +0000,
Sascha Bischoff <Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> Initialise the private interrupts (PPIs, only) for GICv5. This means
> that a GICv5-style intid is generated (which encodes the PPI type in
> the top bits) instead of the 0-based index that is used for older
> GICs.
> 
> Additionally, set all of the GICv5 PPIs to use Level for the handling
> mode, with the exception of the SW_PPI which uses Edge. This matches
> the architecturally-defined set in the GICv5 specification (the CTIIRQ
> handling mode is IMPDEF, so Level has been picked for that).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
> index d1db384698238..e4a230c3857ff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
> @@ -254,14 +254,20 @@ static int vgic_allocate_private_irqs_locked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 type)
>  {
>  	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
>  	int i;
> +	u32 num_private_irqs;

uber-nit: things look better like this:

	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
	u32 num_private_irqs;
	int i;

I know, that's silly. I'll take my pills shortly.

>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock);
>  
>  	if (vgic_cpu->private_irqs)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	if (vgic_is_v5(vcpu->kvm))
> +		num_private_irqs = VGIC_V5_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS;
> +	else
> +		num_private_irqs = VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS;
> +
>  	vgic_cpu->private_irqs = kzalloc_objs(struct vgic_irq,
> -					      VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS,
> +					      num_private_irqs,
>  					      GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>  
>  	if (!vgic_cpu->private_irqs)
> @@ -271,22 +277,37 @@ static int vgic_allocate_private_irqs_locked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 type)
>  	 * Enable and configure all SGIs to be edge-triggered and
>  	 * configure all PPIs as level-triggered.
>  	 */
> -	for (i = 0; i < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_private_irqs; i++) {
>  		struct vgic_irq *irq = &vgic_cpu->private_irqs[i];
>  
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&irq->ap_list);
>  		raw_spin_lock_init(&irq->irq_lock);
> -		irq->intid = i;
>  		irq->vcpu = NULL;
>  		irq->target_vcpu = vcpu;
>  		refcount_set(&irq->refcount, 0);
> -		if (vgic_irq_is_sgi(i)) {
> -			/* SGIs */
> -			irq->enabled = 1;
> -			irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_EDGE;
> +		if (!vgic_is_v5(vcpu->kvm)) {
> +			irq->intid = i;
> +			if (vgic_irq_is_sgi(i)) {
> +				/* SGIs */
> +				irq->enabled = 1;
> +				irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_EDGE;
> +			} else {
> +				/* PPIs */
> +				irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL;
> +			}
>  		} else {
> -			/* PPIs */
> -			irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL;
> +			irq->intid = FIELD_PREP(GICV5_HWIRQ_ID, i) |
> +				     FIELD_PREP(GICV5_HWIRQ_TYPE,
> +						GICV5_HWIRQ_TYPE_PPI);
> +
> +			/* The only Edge architected PPI is the SW_PPI */
> +			if (i == GICV5_ARCH_PPI_SW_PPI)
> +				irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_EDGE;
> +			else
> +				irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL;
> +
> +			/* Register the GICv5-specific PPI ops */
> +			vgic_v5_set_ppi_ops(irq);
>  		}
>  
>  		switch (type) {

That's another point where I'd rather have structural changes to the
code, moving the SGI/PPI init to their own helper:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index 7df7b8aa77a69..0a2468fef86c6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -262,6 +262,66 @@ int kvm_vgic_vcpu_nv_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void vgic_init_private_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int i, u32 type)
+{
+	struct vgic_irq *irq = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.private_irqs[i];
+
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&irq->ap_list);
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&irq->irq_lock);
+	irq->vcpu = NULL;
+	irq->target_vcpu = vcpu;
+	refcount_set(&irq->refcount, 0);
+	irq->intid = i;
+
+	/*
+	 * Enable and configure all SGIs to be edge-triggered and
+	 * configure all PPIs as level-triggered.
+	 */
+	if (vgic_irq_is_sgi(i)) {
+		/* SGIs */
+		irq->enabled = 1;
+		irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_EDGE;
+	} else {
+		/* PPIs */
+		irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL;
+	}
+
+	switch (type) {
+	case KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3:
+		irq->group = 1;
+		irq->mpidr = kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff(vcpu);
+		break;
+	case KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2:
+		irq->group = 0;
+		irq->targets = BIT(vcpu->vcpu_id);
+		break;
+	}
+}
+
+static void vgic_v5_init_private_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int i, u32 type)
+{
+	struct vgic_irq *irq = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.private_irqs[i];
+
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&irq->ap_list);
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&irq->irq_lock);
+	irq->vcpu = NULL;
+	irq->target_vcpu = vcpu;
+	refcount_set(&irq->refcount, 0);
+
+	irq->intid = FIELD_PREP(GICV5_HWIRQ_ID, i) |
+		FIELD_PREP(GICV5_HWIRQ_TYPE,
+			   GICV5_HWIRQ_TYPE_PPI);
+
+	/* The only Edge architected PPI is the SW_PPI */
+	if (i == GICV5_ARCH_PPI_SW_PPI)
+		irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_EDGE;
+	else
+		irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL;
+
+	/* Register the GICv5-specific PPI ops */
+	vgic_v5_set_ppi_ops(irq);
+}
+
 static int vgic_allocate_private_irqs_locked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 type)
 {
 	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
@@ -285,53 +345,11 @@ static int vgic_allocate_private_irqs_locked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 type)
 	if (!vgic_cpu->private_irqs)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	/*
-	 * Enable and configure all SGIs to be edge-triggered and
-	 * configure all PPIs as level-triggered.
-	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < num_private_irqs; i++) {
-		struct vgic_irq *irq = &vgic_cpu->private_irqs[i];
-
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&irq->ap_list);
-		raw_spin_lock_init(&irq->irq_lock);
-		irq->vcpu = NULL;
-		irq->target_vcpu = vcpu;
-		refcount_set(&irq->refcount, 0);
-		if (!vgic_is_v5(vcpu->kvm)) {
-			irq->intid = i;
-			if (vgic_irq_is_sgi(i)) {
-				/* SGIs */
-				irq->enabled = 1;
-				irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_EDGE;
-			} else {
-				/* PPIs */
-				irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL;
-			}
-		} else {
-			irq->intid = FIELD_PREP(GICV5_HWIRQ_ID, i) |
-				     FIELD_PREP(GICV5_HWIRQ_TYPE,
-						GICV5_HWIRQ_TYPE_PPI);
-
-			/* The only Edge architected PPI is the SW_PPI */
-			if (i == GICV5_ARCH_PPI_SW_PPI)
-				irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_EDGE;
-			else
-				irq->config = VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL;
-
-			/* Register the GICv5-specific PPI ops */
-			vgic_v5_set_ppi_ops(irq);
-		}
-
-		switch (type) {
-		case KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3:
-			irq->group = 1;
-			irq->mpidr = kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff(vcpu);
-			break;
-		case KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2:
-			irq->group = 0;
-			irq->targets = BIT(vcpu->vcpu_id);
-			break;
-		}
+		if (type == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V5)
+			vgic_v5_init_private_irq(vcpu, i, type);
+		else
+			vgic_init_private_irq(vcpu, i, type);
 	}
 
 	return 0;

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-04 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-26 15:55 [PATCH v5 00/36] KVM: arm64: Introduce vGIC-v5 with PPI support Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:55 ` [PATCH v5 01/36] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Drop userspace write sanitization for ID_AA64PFR0.GIC on GICv5 Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:55 ` [PATCH v5 02/36] KVM: arm64: vgic: Rework vgic_is_v3() and add vgic_host_has_gicvX() Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 03/36] KVM: arm64: Return early from kvm_finalize_sys_regs() if guest has run Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 04/36] arm64/sysreg: Add remaining GICv5 ICC_ & ICH_ sysregs for KVM support Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 05/36] arm64/sysreg: Add GICR CDNMIA encoding Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 06/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Add ARM_VGIC_V5 device to KVM headers Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/36] KVM: arm64: gic: Introduce interrupt type helpers Sascha Bischoff
2026-03-03 15:04   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-03-03 17:21     ` Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 08/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Add Arm copyright header Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 09/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Detect implemented PPIs on boot Sascha Bischoff
2026-03-03 15:10   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-03-03 17:22     ` Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:58 ` [PATCH v5 10/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Sanitize ID_AA64PFR2_EL1.GCIE Sascha Bischoff
2026-03-03 15:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-03-03 17:49     ` Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:58 ` [PATCH v5 11/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Support GICv5 FGTs & FGUs Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:58 ` [PATCH v5 12/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Add emulation for ICC_IAFFIDR_EL1 accesses Sascha Bischoff
2026-03-03 16:02   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-03-03 17:54     ` Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:58 ` [PATCH v5 13/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Trap and emulate ICC_IDR0_EL1 accesses Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:59 ` [PATCH v5 14/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Add vgic-v5 save/restore hyp interface Sascha Bischoff
2026-03-03 17:10   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-03-04 11:32     ` Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:59 ` [PATCH v5 15/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Implement GICv5 load/put and save/restore Sascha Bischoff
2026-03-04  9:26   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-03-04 14:21     ` Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:59 ` [PATCH v5 16/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Implement direct injection of PPIs Sascha Bischoff
2026-03-04  9:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-03-05 11:22     ` Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 15:59 ` [PATCH v5 17/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Finalize GICv5 PPIs and generate mask Sascha Bischoff
2026-03-04 10:50   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-03-04 17:38     ` Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:00 ` [PATCH v5 18/36] KVM: arm64: gic: Introduce queue_irq_unlock to irq_ops Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:00 ` [PATCH v5 19/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Implement PPI interrupt injection Sascha Bischoff
2026-03-04 13:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-02-26 16:00 ` [PATCH v5 20/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Init Private IRQs (PPIs) for GICv5 Sascha Bischoff
2026-03-04 14:21   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-03-05 13:35     ` Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:00 ` [PATCH v5 21/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Check for pending PPIs Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:01 ` [PATCH v5 22/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Trap and mask guest ICC_PPI_ENABLERx_EL1 writes Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:01 ` [PATCH v5 23/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Support GICv5 interrupts with KVM_IRQ_LINE Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:01 ` [PATCH v5 24/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Create and initialise vgic_v5 Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:01 ` [PATCH v5 25/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Initialise ID and priority bits when resetting vcpu Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:02 ` [PATCH v5 26/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Enlighten arch timer for GICv5 Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:02 ` [PATCH v5 27/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Mandate architected PPI for PMU emulation on GICv5 Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:02 ` [PATCH v5 28/36] KVM: arm64: gic: Hide GICv5 for protected guests Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:02 ` [PATCH v5 29/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Hide FEAT_GCIE from NV GICv5 guests Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:03 ` [PATCH v5 30/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Introduce kvm_arm_vgic_v5_ops and register them Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:03 ` [PATCH v5 31/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Set ICH_VCTLR_EL2.En on boot Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:03 ` [PATCH v5 32/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Probe for GICv5 device Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:04 ` [PATCH v5 33/36] Documentation: KVM: Introduce documentation for VGICv5 Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:04 ` [PATCH v5 34/36] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce a minimal GICv5 PPI selftest Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:04 ` [PATCH v5 35/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Communicate userspace-driveable PPIs via a UAPI Sascha Bischoff
2026-02-26 16:04 ` [PATCH v5 36/36] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add no-vgic-v5 selftest Sascha Bischoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86zf4n7k1a.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Joey.Gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=Timothy.Hayes@arm.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.