From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Packard Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix invalid backpanel values for GEN3 or older chips Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:10:38 -0800 Message-ID: <86zkfpgxcx.fsf@sumi.keithp.com> References: <861ut5mdvn.fsf@sumi.keithp.com> <867h2wklln.fsf@sumi.keithp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Daniel Mack , Chris Wilson , Jesse Barnes , harald@redhat.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:22:50 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > So, writing bit-0 caused a problem, as it seems. Thanks. I've noted that in the patch message. =2D-=20 keith.packard@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBTsqUHjYtFsjWk68qAQgmGA//VAZYhC5pcDk73iU32uSQuKPnt36yg8T6 z671LTDETr1LC+lPRsW2xnhzPz1di5C+i+nQGdAujUCtSo9tIJLccJDtgYHuAkwO cbs9ik4Xy1sLh7t4L+aub8YGcXZgTxbn5rxtr5bB+8RZ/xrOfA6Y6rKXQZhn/iKH CIPGfIFffomNE+Ybt7g75k2wU00qiC9PJNVFPqgG2ovRtm9BkcHWA913VCLGMkFl f0c3TSg/euFsK+296YJxPc1xIgel9vUNr1/ejn5fIV6i7QEliO17Fe4s8xfHrPS4 PxJikq5LhUkKF6BtrDD6+M/t4KJWdsdm/VbKf4CwVLEuXpLovty3S6VENlUVo7sp 8K2ylK4dLSYMS6qi5+2SCNjxHevo3glLqBaUxw76KRI+FCyqO9JzMEHbXmk4v4Ot LRKeG6qvX3bmzrc2sQIjmdiUD0kSZiNpvoZddieFevmxpMIsaJ4sEzXBdhWLlJn+ 8J2fgsLk+j0/zQ8bU6fznGlSrivO1VdyZddGsal2Z+Wj9SSHogCmjtzZPlkXn0x7 duavKbopZL6YnMfcpM7aDGPR7yi+8+m/pWFMfj78rqMYZzsAqJ6RHRqsQTZHuH9C UCzpVveyg6XAmaZJO4rdtft9PCxhcEz/U1zdy2eCCM/CSeaK0LAYaTso+/PomqGI 1/gbgsvO+I8= =HTsT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--