From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3F593955C8 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2026 08:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780907537; cv=none; b=EoUmdkClbxQIH3siVRI+mJp5V5YZuPJwbvjDhykYHxMaGZMNTf4+I756R8M535pc+QJ2CpiZcmK19eq8EnPFpcuJWbaGJ/eRibPShT/SBfejPKZEOSMd7qkK+oxUnDSxFFYIsdUo0moMjM4EvFuYlVJUEih70iF51z5uTH6wd0o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780907537; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2zZWGodHsFtAhzqiuBWHMADjQetL7unLpGv+qW8rnIk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tfOaIJSWY7ngIlsX5hHpYOg5sLSHpbpBww4xdpWmegRON+5CD/51mL9GHSWDfWDtgeQCvU5jcsDagrcG4I8kXXuIvyckhARgRRIZk7PZ9XkhdcI3Ga0y1c3bLlPZ2CZnJNyX9bo56w3ANhW54pmHC98w1QX4gi7smQN9c7zSTcA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dfwEHAOZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dfwEHAOZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC17C1F00893; Mon, 8 Jun 2026 08:32:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780907535; bh=2zZWGodHsFtAhzqiuBWHMADjQetL7unLpGv+qW8rnIk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=dfwEHAOZg1wTtLrXQXzgOEHzMYfp3MjHILrjns45sBk81fi5OUUTCNcf9U2lA+NEA 37geicqtazZ8FgOZ33YlqaQPtBb/F3W/CfauNbHQU5/tsTYkQQIfYPxaaE/fNYptGZ Xf9Xx4czP4KhJ9ZoAhecjXT5MXgkSXrndrioBUKmz4lU+7B3LAw04d90p70t/1+S4y K3CoZqLOeXtz2MVxxzcAoYpuyzUcuakNEspvv77TQ0oWcdX2it0uwZUYrmLHBZ6Zw6 CZlKHf5XYzRNM+WNZUPC3M2TJ4p0pROfvxD/sJRSvQYUfrSW4RZOnYUJaxjinHVc1e ld0GxWFgzTIvA== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Chen Yu , tony.luck@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, dave.martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, fenghuay@nvidia.com, babu.moger@amd.com, anil.keshavamurthy@broadcom.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/resctrl: Rename prev_msr to prev_mon_val In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:32:12 +0200 Message-ID: <871peh5t6b.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Sat, Jun 06 2026 at 10:35, Chen Yu wrote: > Rename the prev_msr field in struct arch_mbm_state to prev_mon_val. > With ERDT, the previous monitor value may come from an MMIO > register rather than from an MSR, so the "msr" suffix is no longer > accurate. The new name describes the field by its meaning (the > previous monitor value) instead of by the access method. > > This is preparation for ERDT support, which reads monitoring > counters via MMIO. > > No functional change. > > Co-developed-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy > Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner