Re: [PATCH v1 6/6] docs: 6.Followthrough.rst: advice on handling regressions fixes

[Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>]

Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info> writes:

> Add some advice on how to handle regressions as developer, reviewer, and
> maintainer, as resolving regression without unnecessary delays requires
> multiple people working hand in hand.
>
> This removes equivalent paragraphs from a section in
> Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst, which will become mostly
> obsolete through this and follow-up changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/6.Followthrough.rst     | 24 ++++++++++++++++---
>  .../process/handling-regressions.rst          | 16 -------------
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Nothing really to complain about here (though I do worry a bit about the
idea that calling something a regression fix allows bypassing all of our
usual testing).

Thanks,

jon