All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, suraj.kandpal@intel.com,
	imre.deak@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/dp: Separate out helper for compute fec_enable
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 13:52:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871pz62kcn.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241120103802.134295-4-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Wed, 20 Nov 2024, Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> wrote:
> Make a separate function for setting fec_enable in crtc_state.
> Drop the check for FEC support as its already checked while checking for
> DSC support.

That's two changes that generally shouldn't be bundled together.

Aim for separating non-functional refactoring and functional
changes. (Well, arguably dropping the FEC check should also be
non-functional, but you know what I mean.)

> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index dee15a05e7fd..d82e25d0dc5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -2352,6 +2352,26 @@ static int intel_edp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void intel_dp_compute_fec_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +					struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)

I think all encoder->callback_name hooks should be named
something_something_callback_name(), and the same goes for helpers
specifically aimed at this.

This would make the function intel_dp_fec_compute_config().

Yes, in many ways "compute fec config" reads better, but there's value
in being able to search for "_compute_config", and to know this is only
for he ->compute_config path.

BR,
Jani.


> +{
> +	if (pipe_config->fec_enable)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Though eDP v1.5 supports FEC with DSC, unlike DP, it is optional.
> +	 * Since, FEC is a bandwidth overhead, continue to not enable it for
> +	 * eDP. Until, there is a good reason to do so.
> +	 */
> +	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (intel_dp_is_uhbr(pipe_config))
> +		return;
> +
> +	pipe_config->fec_enable = true;
> +}
> +
>  int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  				struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
>  				struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> @@ -2368,15 +2388,7 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	int num_joined_pipes = intel_crtc_num_joined_pipes(pipe_config);
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Though eDP v1.5 supports FEC with DSC, unlike DP, it is optional.
> -	 * Since, FEC is a bandwidth overhead, continue to not enable it for
> -	 * eDP. Until, there is a good reason to do so.
> -	 */
> -	pipe_config->fec_enable = pipe_config->fec_enable ||
> -		(!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> -		 intel_dp_supports_fec(intel_dp, connector, pipe_config) &&
> -		 !intel_dp_is_uhbr(pipe_config));
> +	intel_dp_compute_fec_config(intel_dp, pipe_config);
>  
>  	if (!intel_dp_dsc_supports_format(connector, pipe_config->output_format))
>  		return -EINVAL;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-20 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-20 10:37 [PATCH 00/12] DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915/dp: Refactor FEC support check in intel_dp_supports_dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-28 12:46   ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/dp: Return early if DSC not supported Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-27  5:43   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-03  8:32     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-12-03  8:35       ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/dp: Separate out helper for compute fec_enable Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 11:52   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-11-20 12:37     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-11-20 12:51       ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/dp: Remove HAS_DSC macro for intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-27  5:45   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-11-28 10:35     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915/dp: Return int from dsc_max/min_src_input_bpc helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Use helpers to get dsc min/max input bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/dp: Drop max_requested_bpc for dsc pipe_min/max bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915/dp: Refactor pipe_bpp limits with dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:37 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Refactor pipe_bpp limits with dsc for mst Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-27  5:51   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-11-20 10:38 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915/dp: Use clamp for pipe_bpp limits with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:38 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915/dp: Make dsc helpers accept const crtc_state pointers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-27  5:56   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-11-20 10:38 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/dp: Set the DSC link limits intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits Ankit Nautiyal
2024-11-20 10:41 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2024-11-20 10:42 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-11-20 10:43 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-11-20 11:01 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-20 11:03 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-20 11:05 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-20 11:23 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-11-20 11:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes (rev9) Patchwork
2024-11-20 18:45 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871pz62kcn.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.