From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>,
Jerry.Zuo@amd.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
lyude@redhat.com
Cc: Harry.Wentland@amd.com, Wayne.Lin@amd.com,
Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com,
Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Update MST First Link Slot Information Based on Encoding Format
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:09:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871r4oykh5.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211012215848.1507023-1-Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021, Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> wrote:
> 8b/10b encoding format requires to reserve the first slot for
> recording metadata. Real data transmission starts from the second slot,
> with a total of available 63 slots available.
>
> In 128b/132b encoding format, metadata is transmitted separately
> in LLCP packet before MTP. Real data transmission starts from
> the first slot, with a total of 64 slots available.
>
> v2:
> * Remove get_mst_link_encoding_cap
> * Move total/start slots to mst_state, and copy it to mst_mgr in
> atomic_check
>
> Signed-off-by: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 35 +++++++++++++++----
> include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 13 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> index 5020f2d36fe1..4ad50eb0091a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> @@ -10612,6 +10612,8 @@ static int amdgpu_dm_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
> #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_DCN)
> struct dsc_mst_fairness_vars vars[MAX_PIPES];
> #endif
> + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state;
> + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr;
>
> trace_amdgpu_dm_atomic_check_begin(state);
>
> @@ -10819,6 +10821,32 @@ static int amdgpu_dm_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
> lock_and_validation_needed = true;
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_DCN)
> + for_each_new_mst_mgr_in_state(state, mgr, mst_state, i) {
> + struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector;
> + struct drm_connector *connector;
> + struct drm_connector_list_iter iter;
> + u8 link_coding_cap;
> +
> + if (!mgr->mst_state )
> + continue;
> +
> + drm_connector_list_iter_begin(dev, &iter);
> + drm_for_each_connector_iter(connector, &iter) {
> + int id = connector->index;
> +
> + if (id == mst_state->mgr->conn_base_id) {
> + aconnector = to_amdgpu_dm_connector(connector);
> + link_coding_cap = dc_link_dp_mst_decide_link_encoding_format(aconnector->dc_link);
> + drm_dp_mst_update_coding_cap(mst_state, link_coding_cap);
> +
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + drm_connector_list_iter_end(&iter);
> +
> + }
> +#endif
I wonder if we could split this to separate drm dp helper and amd driver
patches?
> /**
> * Streams and planes are reset when there are changes that affect
> * bandwidth. Anything that affects bandwidth needs to go through
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index ad0795afc21c..fb5c47c4cb2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -3368,7 +3368,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> struct drm_dp_payload req_payload;
> struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
> int i, j;
> - int cur_slots = 1;
> + int cur_slots = mgr->start_slot;
> bool skip;
>
> mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
> @@ -4321,7 +4321,7 @@ int drm_dp_find_vcpi_slots(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> num_slots = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn, mgr->pbn_div);
>
> /* max. time slots - one slot for MTP header */
> - if (num_slots > 63)
> + if (num_slots > mgr->total_avail_slots)
> return -ENOSPC;
> return num_slots;
> }
> @@ -4333,7 +4333,7 @@ static int drm_dp_init_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> int ret;
>
> /* max. time slots - one slot for MTP header */
> - if (slots > 63)
> + if (slots > mgr->total_avail_slots)
> return -ENOSPC;
>
> vcpi->pbn = pbn;
> @@ -4507,6 +4507,18 @@ int drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots);
>
> +void drm_dp_mst_update_coding_cap(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state, uint8_t link_coding_cap)
> +{
> + if (link_coding_cap == DP_CAP_ANSI_128B132B) {
> + mst_state->total_avail_slots = 64;
> + mst_state->start_slot = 0;
> + }
The values never change AFAICT, should we store the channel encoding
instead, and use that information to initialize the values?
(Alternatively, why aren't the 8b/10b values initialized here if
128b/132b are?)
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s coding format on mgr 0x%p\n",
> + (link_coding_cap == DP_CAP_ANSI_128B132B) ? "128b/132b":"8b/10b", mst_state->mgr);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_update_coding_cap);
> +
> /**
> * drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi() - Allocate a virtual channel
> * @mgr: manager for this port
> @@ -4538,8 +4550,8 @@ bool drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>
> ret = drm_dp_init_vcpi(mgr, &port->vcpi, pbn, slots);
> if (ret) {
> - drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "failed to init vcpi slots=%d max=63 ret=%d\n",
> - DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn, mgr->pbn_div), ret);
> + drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "failed to init vcpi slots=%d max=%d ret=%d\n",
> + DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn, mgr->pbn_div), mgr->total_avail_slots, ret);
> drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -5226,7 +5238,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_vcpi_alloc_limit(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state)
> {
> struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *vcpi;
> - int avail_slots = 63, payload_count = 0;
> + int avail_slots = mgr->total_avail_slots, payload_count = 0;
>
> list_for_each_entry(vcpi, &mst_state->vcpis, next) {
> /* Releasing VCPI is always OK-even if the port is gone */
> @@ -5255,7 +5267,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_vcpi_alloc_limit(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> }
> }
> drm_dbg_atomic(mgr->dev, "[MST MGR:%p] mst state %p VCPI avail=%d used=%d\n",
> - mgr, mst_state, avail_slots, 63 - avail_slots);
> + mgr, mst_state, avail_slots, mgr->total_avail_slots - avail_slots);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -5421,6 +5433,10 @@ int drm_dp_mst_atomic_check(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> break;
>
> mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
> +
> + mgr->start_slot = mst_state->start_slot;
> + mgr->total_avail_slots = mst_state->total_avail_slots;
> +
It feels wrong to me to be copying stuff from mst_state to mgr in
general, and in atomic check hook in particular.
> ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mstb_bw_limit(mgr->mst_primary,
> mst_state);
> mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
> @@ -5527,11 +5543,16 @@ int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> if (!mgr->proposed_vcpis)
> return -ENOMEM;
> set_bit(0, &mgr->payload_mask);
> + mgr->total_avail_slots = 63;
> + mgr->start_slot = 1;
>
> mst_state = kzalloc(sizeof(*mst_state), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (mst_state == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + mst_state->total_avail_slots = 63;
> + mst_state->start_slot = 1;
> +
The magic values for 8b/10b are now duplicated to two places, with the
128b/132b values in a separate place.
BR,
Jani.
> mst_state->mgr = mgr;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mst_state->vcpis);
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> index ddb9231d0309..f8152dfb34ed 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> @@ -554,6 +554,8 @@ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state {
> struct drm_private_state base;
> struct list_head vcpis;
> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr;
> + u8 total_avail_slots;
> + u8 start_slot;
> };
>
> #define to_dp_mst_topology_mgr(x) container_of(x, struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr, base)
> @@ -661,6 +663,16 @@ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr {
> */
> int pbn_div;
>
> + /**
> + * @total_avail_slots: 63 for 8b/10b, 64 for 128/132b
> + */
> + u8 total_avail_slots;
> +
> + /**
> + * @start_slot: 1 for 8b/10b, 0 for 128/132b
> + */
> + u8 start_slot;
> +
> /**
> * @funcs: Atomic helper callbacks
> */
> @@ -806,6 +818,7 @@ int drm_dp_mst_get_vcpi_slots(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, struct drm_dp
>
> void drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, struct drm_dp_mst_port *port);
>
> +void drm_dp_mst_update_coding_cap(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state, uint8_t link_coding_cap);
>
> void drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> struct drm_dp_mst_port *port);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-27 23:43 [PATCH 0/2] Update 128b/132b MST Slot Information Fangzhi Zuo
2021-08-27 23:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm: Update MST First Link Slot Information Based on Encoding Format Fangzhi Zuo
2021-08-28 4:09 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-28 4:09 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-30 20:00 ` Lyude Paul
2021-08-31 19:44 ` Zuo, Jerry
2021-08-31 20:19 ` Lyude Paul
2021-08-31 22:44 ` Lyude Paul
2021-10-12 21:58 ` [PATCH] " Bhawanpreet Lakha
2021-10-12 22:02 ` Lakha, Bhawanpreet
2021-10-12 22:09 ` Lyude Paul
2021-10-13 16:09 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-10-13 19:33 ` Bhawanpreet Lakha
2021-10-13 19:37 ` Lyude Paul
2021-10-13 18:52 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-13 18:52 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-13 21:54 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-13 21:54 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-13 22:25 ` Lyude Paul
2021-10-14 20:21 ` Bhawanpreet Lakha
2021-10-14 20:22 ` Bhawanpreet Lakha
2021-10-15 20:04 ` Lyude Paul
2021-10-15 19:43 ` Bhawanpreet Lakha
2021-10-15 20:41 ` Lyude Paul
2021-10-18 19:47 ` Bhawanpreet Lakha
2021-10-18 23:17 ` Lyude Paul
2021-10-19 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] " Bhawanpreet Lakha
2021-10-20 8:34 ` Jani Nikula
2021-08-31 22:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Lyude Paul
2021-08-31 22:46 ` Lyude Paul
2021-08-27 23:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: Example Usage in AMDGPU Fangzhi Zuo
2021-08-28 11:54 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-28 11:54 ` kernel test robot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-26 3:14 [PATCH] drm: Update MST First Link Slot Information Based on Encoding Format Fangzhi Zuo
2021-03-26 3:14 ` Fangzhi Zuo
2021-03-26 16:48 ` Lyude Paul
2021-03-26 16:48 ` Lyude Paul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871r4oykh5.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com \
--cc=Harry.Wentland@amd.com \
--cc=Jerry.Zuo@amd.com \
--cc=Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com \
--cc=Wayne.Lin@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.