From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A30C07E9B for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D506113C for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:21:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 35D506113C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C314B0D4; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:21:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s+2giSXJ6b9R; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:21:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91444B0A3; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:21:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80034A3A5 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:21:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rMWtZUqFMAJQ for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:21:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E930B4A2E5 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:21:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03C7E60FE9; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sofa.misterjones.org ([185.219.108.64] helo=why.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5msI-00EU7S-5b; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:21:18 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:21:17 +0100 Message-ID: <871r7t9tgi.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Quentin Perret Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner into kvm_pgtable_stage2_annotate In-Reply-To: References: <20210715163159.1480168-1-maz@kernel.org> <20210715163159.1480168-4-maz@kernel.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 185.219.108.64 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: qperret@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, dbrazdil@google.com, vatsa@codeaurora.org, sdonthineni@nvidia.com, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: kernel-team@android.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Srivatsa Vaddagiri , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shanker R Donthineni , will@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:09:21 +0100, Quentin Perret wrote: > > On Thursday 15 Jul 2021 at 17:31:46 (+0100), Marc Zyngier wrote: > > @@ -815,7 +807,7 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size, > > .arg = &map_data, > > }; > > > > - if (owner_id > KVM_MAX_OWNER_ID) > > + if (!annotation || (annotation & PTE_VALID)) > > return -EINVAL; > > Why do you consider annotation==0 invalid? The assumption so far has > been that the owner_id for the host is 0, so annotating a range with 0s > should be a valid operation -- this will be required when e.g. > transferring ownership of a page back to the host. How do you then distinguish it from an empty entry that doesn't map to anything at all? M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84FFC07E9B for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 956BD610D2 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:23:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 956BD610D2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:Cc:To:From:Message-ID:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=rS1QkLOxn9XaFhDlb3hj7MarGMMFMVXvFaG5MHBUaXo=; b=gKaBHGv0Vmv/yS hCND+HWMcM2fRRfc50XIVM4Pz6oFtiDHnkCV+WukxZTUktrQkOKf7iFcvdL/ar2Z7//BbdxWc9IBj nb9bVt4imLeKwUrvRPO4CUp25w/sj22uRhlN+rYVPSVD6J+axwvAaf7vr8jsCO9w0ksFWxVvTLGum 4YHU2bvkIqbhUqNoMNIcdzxh9xPPTXzx8REnOHusJ6hqM7wU1WtzZ5FCqbF7gbn4VtNc8UEd2sYGR SYn9DE4/d5XwZGsq4FedthPWbE2A8zvtHtXiAJ7L7xeklWIsSA6iC8cdUJHAAtemq1C+rwwtg9v5x ajTK5c7LCUokxDLN6Ztg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m5msO-00CVOp-Kd; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:21:24 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m5msK-00CVOB-Lr for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:21:21 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03C7E60FE9; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sofa.misterjones.org ([185.219.108.64] helo=why.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5msI-00EU7S-5b; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:21:18 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:21:17 +0100 Message-ID: <871r7t9tgi.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Quentin Perret Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, dbrazdil@google.com, Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Shanker R Donthineni , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Alexandru Elisei , kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner into kvm_pgtable_stage2_annotate In-Reply-To: References: <20210715163159.1480168-1-maz@kernel.org> <20210715163159.1480168-4-maz@kernel.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 185.219.108.64 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: qperret@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, dbrazdil@google.com, vatsa@codeaurora.org, sdonthineni@nvidia.com, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210720_032120_773983_97C80B6E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.91 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:09:21 +0100, Quentin Perret wrote: > > On Thursday 15 Jul 2021 at 17:31:46 (+0100), Marc Zyngier wrote: > > @@ -815,7 +807,7 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size, > > .arg = &map_data, > > }; > > > > - if (owner_id > KVM_MAX_OWNER_ID) > > + if (!annotation || (annotation & PTE_VALID)) > > return -EINVAL; > > Why do you consider annotation==0 invalid? The assumption so far has > been that the owner_id for the host is 0, so annotating a range with 0s > should be a valid operation -- this will be required when e.g. > transferring ownership of a page back to the host. How do you then distinguish it from an empty entry that doesn't map to anything at all? M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33293C6377C for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDAA61283 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237217AbhGTJlr (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 05:41:47 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58464 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236692AbhGTJkl (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 05:40:41 -0400 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03C7E60FE9; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sofa.misterjones.org ([185.219.108.64] helo=why.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5msI-00EU7S-5b; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:21:18 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:21:17 +0100 Message-ID: <871r7t9tgi.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Quentin Perret Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, dbrazdil@google.com, Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Shanker R Donthineni , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Alexandru Elisei , kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner into kvm_pgtable_stage2_annotate In-Reply-To: References: <20210715163159.1480168-1-maz@kernel.org> <20210715163159.1480168-4-maz@kernel.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 185.219.108.64 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: qperret@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, dbrazdil@google.com, vatsa@codeaurora.org, sdonthineni@nvidia.com, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:09:21 +0100, Quentin Perret wrote: > > On Thursday 15 Jul 2021 at 17:31:46 (+0100), Marc Zyngier wrote: > > @@ -815,7 +807,7 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size, > > .arg = &map_data, > > }; > > > > - if (owner_id > KVM_MAX_OWNER_ID) > > + if (!annotation || (annotation & PTE_VALID)) > > return -EINVAL; > > Why do you consider annotation==0 invalid? The assumption so far has > been that the owner_id for the host is 0, so annotating a range with 0s > should be a valid operation -- this will be required when e.g. > transferring ownership of a page back to the host. How do you then distinguish it from an empty entry that doesn't map to anything at all? M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.