All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix context type resolving for extension programs
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:52:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rj8bn6m.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQ+3sBR7dTQhX+eHvzJajtnm0QctjrWFyc+LMkHJOoOabA@mail.gmail.com>

Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:11 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Eelco reported we can't properly access arguments if the tracing
>> program is attached to extension program.
>>
>> Having following program:
>>
>>   SEC("classifier/test_pkt_md_access")
>>   int test_pkt_md_access(struct __sk_buff *skb)
>>
>> with its extension:
>>
>>   SEC("freplace/test_pkt_md_access")
>>   int test_pkt_md_access_new(struct __sk_buff *skb)
>>
>> and tracing that extension with:
>>
>>   SEC("fentry/test_pkt_md_access_new")
>>   int BPF_PROG(fentry, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>
>> It's not possible to access skb argument in the fentry program,
>> with following error from verifier:
>>
>>   ; int BPF_PROG(fentry, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>   0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
>>   invalid bpf_context access off=0 size=8
>>
>> The problem is that btf_ctx_access gets the context type for the
>> traced program, which is in this case the extension.
>>
>> But when we trace extension program, we want to get the context
>> type of the program that the extension is attached to, so we can
>> access the argument properly in the trace program.
>>
>> Reported-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  kernel/bpf/btf.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
>> index f9ac6935ab3c..37ad01c32e5a 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
>> @@ -3859,6 +3859,14 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
>>         }
>>
>>         info->reg_type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID;
>> +
>> +       /* When we trace extension program, we want to get the context
>> +        * type of the program that the extension is attached to, so
>> +        * we can access the argument properly in the trace program.
>> +        */
>> +       if (tgt_prog && tgt_prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT)
>> +               tgt_prog = tgt_prog->aux->linked_prog;
>> +
>>         if (tgt_prog) {
>>                 ret = btf_translate_to_vmlinux(log, btf, t, tgt_prog->type, arg);
>
> I think it would be cleaner to move resolve_prog_type() from verifier.c
> and use that helper function here.

FYI, I've added a different version of this patch to my freplace
multi-attach series (since the approach here was incompatible with
that).

-Toke


      reply	other threads:[~2020-09-11 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-09 15:11 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix context type resolving for extension programs Jiri Olsa
2020-09-09 15:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Adding test for arg dereference in extension trace Jiri Olsa
2020-09-10 22:34   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-11 11:01     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-11 13:02     ` Jiri Olsa
2020-09-09 15:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix context type resolving for extension programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-09 18:58   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-09-10  9:49     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-10 18:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-09-11 10:52   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871rj8bn6m.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.