From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Sabotague the RING_HEAD
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 19:55:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rr19fgp.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200211150951.1026811-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Apply vast quantities of poison and not tell anyone to see if we fall
> for the trap of using a stale RING_HEAD.
>
> References: 42827350f75c ("drm/i915/gt: Avoid resetting ring->head outside of its timeline mutex")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> index 82fa0712808e..1421dc2db7cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> @@ -300,6 +300,80 @@ static int live_unlite_preempt(void *arg)
> return live_unlite_restore(arg, I915_USER_PRIORITY(I915_PRIORITY_MAX));
> }
>
> +static int live_pin_rewind(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> + enum intel_engine_id id;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * We have to be careful not to trust intel_ring too much, for example
> + * ring->head is updated upon retire which is out of sync with pinning
> + * the context. Thus we cannot use ring->head to set CTX_RING_HEAD,
> + * or else we risk writing an older, stale value.
> + *
> + * To simulate this, let's apply a bit of deliberate sabotague.
> + */
> +
> + for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
> + struct intel_context *ce;
> + struct i915_request *rq;
> + struct igt_live_test t;
> +
> + if (igt_live_test_begin(&t, gt->i915, __func__, engine->name)) {
> + err = -EIO;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + ce = intel_context_create(engine);
> + if (IS_ERR(ce)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(ce);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + err = intel_context_pin(ce);
> + if (err) {
> + intel_context_put(ce);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* Keep the context awake while we play games */
> + err = i915_active_acquire(&ce->active);
> + if (err) {
> + intel_context_unpin(ce);
> + intel_context_put(ce);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* Poison the head of the ring */
> + memset32(ce->ring->vaddr, STACK_MAGIC, 1024);
I got affidavit that this will change to poisoning the whole
ring according to size.
> + ce->ring->emit = 1024;
> + ce->ring->tail = 1024;
> +
> + intel_context_unpin(ce);
> +
> + /* Submit a simple nop request */
> + GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_pinned(ce));
> + rq = intel_context_create_request(ce);
The request get the head from ring->emit at this point.
Perhaps there are more nyances but this will atleast test
the boundaries of request emission.
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> + i915_active_release(&ce->active); /* e.g. async retire */
> + intel_context_put(ce);
> + if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(rq);
> + break;
> + }
> + i915_request_add(rq);
> +
> + /* Expect not to hang! */
> + if (igt_live_test_end(&t)) {
> + err = -EIO;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int live_hold_reset(void *arg)
> {
> struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> @@ -3616,6 +3690,7 @@ int intel_execlists_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> SUBTEST(live_sanitycheck),
> SUBTEST(live_unlite_switch),
> SUBTEST(live_unlite_preempt),
> + SUBTEST(live_pin_rewind),
> SUBTEST(live_hold_reset),
> SUBTEST(live_error_interrupt),
> SUBTEST(live_timeslice_preempt),
> --
> 2.25.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-11 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-11 15:09 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Sabotague the RING_HEAD Chris Wilson
2020-02-11 17:55 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2020-02-13 19:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871rr19fgp.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.