From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vovo Yang <vovoy@google.com>
Subject: Re: Threads stuck in zap_pid_ns_processes()
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 22:42:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871sru91w0.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170511224724.GB15676@roeck-us.net> (Guenter Roeck's message of "Thu, 11 May 2017 15:47:24 -0700")
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> writes:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 04:25:23PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> writes:
>> > As an add-on to my previous mail: I added a function to count
>> > the number of threads in the pid namespace, using next_pidmap().
>> > Even though nr_hashed == 2, only the hanging thread is still
>> > present.
>>
>> For your testcase? I suspect you copied the code from
>> zap_pid_ns_processes and skipped pid 1. It is going to be pid 1 that is
>> calling zap_pid_ns_processes.
>>
>
> Almost. Something along the line of
>
> count = 0;
> nr = next_pidmap(pid_ns, 0);
> while (nr > 0) {
> count++;
> nr = next_pidmap(pid_ns, nr);
> }
>
> only I also call sched_show_task() for each thread, and the only
> one printed is the one that hangs in zap_pid_ns_processes().
The function sched_show_task() does:
if (!try_get_task_stack(p))
return;
Which won't work on a zombie who has already released it's stack.
Which is exactly what child2 should be at that point.
Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-12 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-11 17:11 Threads stuck in zap_pid_ns_processes() Guenter Roeck
2017-05-11 17:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-11 18:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-05-11 20:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-11 20:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-05-11 21:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-11 20:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-05-11 21:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-11 22:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-05-11 23:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-12 9:30 ` Vovo Yang
2017-05-12 13:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-12 16:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-05-12 17:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <874lwqyo8i.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-12 17:55 ` [REVIEW][PATCH] pid_ns: Sleep in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE in zap_pid_ns_processes Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-12 17:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <87d1bex8mt.fsf_-_-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-12 19:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-05-12 19:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-05-12 19:43 ` Threads stuck in zap_pid_ns_processes() Guenter Roeck
2017-05-12 20:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-13 14:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-05-13 18:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-06-01 17:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-06-01 18:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-06-01 19:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-06-01 21:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-06-02 1:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-12 3:42 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871sru91w0.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=vovoy@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.