Hi,

Jun Li <jun.li-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-usb-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org [mailto:linux-usb-
>> owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Baolin Wang
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 6:47 PM
>> To: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>; Greg KH <gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>;
>> Sebastian Reichel <sre-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>; Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> <dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>; Peter Chen
>> <peter.chen-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>; Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>;
>> r.baldyga-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org; Yoshihiro Shimoda
>> <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>; Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>; Mark
>> Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>; Charles Keepax
>> <ckeepax-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>; patches-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxxddQ6fo/n9Y@public.gmane.orgom;
>> Linux PM list <linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>; USB <linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>;
>> device-mainlining-cunTk1MwBs98uUxBSJOaYoYkZiVZrdSR2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org; LKML <linux-
>> kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] gadget: Support for the usb charger framework
>> 
>> On 6 April 2016 at 15:19, Peter Chen <hzpeterchen-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:21:50PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> >>
>> >> @@ -563,6 +564,8 @@ struct usb_gadget_ops {
>> >>       struct usb_ep *(*match_ep)(struct usb_gadget *,
>> >>                       struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *,
>> >>                       struct usb_ss_ep_comp_descriptor *);
>> >> +     /* get the charger type */
>> >> +     enum usb_charger_type (*get_charger_type)(struct usb_gadget *);
>> >>  };
>> >
>> > Since we already have get_charger_type callback at usb_charger
>> > structure, why we still need this API at usb_gadget_ops?
>> 
>> In case some users want to get charger type at gadget level.
>> 
> Why gadget needs to know charger type? I also don't catch the intent of

because some gadgets need to call usb_gadget_vbus_draw(), although for
that they need power in mA rather.

> This api, as my understanding, gadget only need report gadget state changes.
> All information required for usb charger is charger type and gadget state.

you're making an assumption about how the HW is laid out which might not
be true.

-- 
balbi