From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Parschauer <sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>,
Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@redhat.com>,
Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
systemd-devel@freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: Drop sending a change uevent when stopping
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:29:28 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871t8brpon.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160217181943.GA28011@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1155 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 18 2016, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 05:25:00PM +0100, Sebastian Parschauer wrote:
>> When stopping an MD device, then its device node /dev/mdX may still
>> exist afterwards or it is recreated by udev. The next open() call
>> can lead to creation of an inoperable MD device. The reason for
>> this is that a change event (KOBJ_CHANGE) is sent to udev which
>> races against the remove event (KOBJ_REMOVE) from md_free().
>> So drop sending the change event.
>>
>> A change is likely also required in mdadm as many versions send the
>> change event to udev as well.
>
> Makes sense, it's unlikely we need the CHANGE event. Applied.
>
> Thanks,
> Shaohua
It would be worth checking, but I think that with this change, you can
write
"inactive" to /sys/block/mdXXX/md/array_state
and the array will become inactive, but no uevent will be generated,
which isn't good.
Maybe send the uevent that was just removed from the 'inactive' case of
array_state_store() instead.
(But I still think this is just a bandaid and doesn't provide any
guarantees that there will be no races with udev)
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-17 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-17 16:25 [PATCH] md: Drop sending a change uevent when stopping Sebastian Parschauer
2016-02-17 18:19 ` Shaohua Li
2016-02-17 21:29 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2016-02-17 22:14 ` Shaohua Li
2016-02-18 6:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-18 23:06 ` NeilBrown
2016-02-19 21:58 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871t8brpon.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jbrassow@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=systemd-devel@freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.