From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53979) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhWtW-0004r2-3X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 01:59:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhWtS-0003uX-3c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 01:59:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56773) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhWtR-0003uP-Uz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 01:59:02 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:58:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Namsun Ch'o's message of "Wed, 30 Sep 2015 02:41:52 -0400") Message-ID: <871tdfnn8d.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] Add argument filters to the seccomp sandbox List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Namsun Ch'o Cc: pmoore@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, eduardo.otubo@profitbricks.com "Namsun Ch'o" writes: >> (I'm not sure what happens to your emails that all of them does not >> relate to the same thread/Message-ID, making a pain to follow through >> out the volume of email on the list, please pay attention to that) > > I just click Reply All, I'm not sure how else I would do it. Are they somehow > being posted as new top level threads instead of replies? This message lacks In-Reply-To: and References: headers. Whatever you use to send e-mail seems grossly deficient. Perhaps it has some "don't be such an ass" configuration button, but I doubt it. [...]