All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: Update weak barriers to use dma_wmb/rmb
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:47:01 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871tjs1xle.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150408004742.2112.25484.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora22>

Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com> writes:
> This change makes it so that instead of using smp_wmb/rmb which varies
> depending on the kernel configuration we can can use dma_wmb/rmb which for
> most architectures should be equal to or slightly more strict than
> smp_wmb/rmb.
>
> The advantage to this is that these barriers are available to uniprocessor
> builds as well so the performance should improve under such a
> configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>

This seems OK to me, since it's really as much a cleanup as anything,
but like you I do wonder if there benefit on ARM in practice.

Applied, thanks.

Cheers,
Rusty.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-11  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-08  0:47 [PATCH] virtio_ring: Update weak barriers to use dma_wmb/rmb Alexander Duyck
2015-04-08  8:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-04-08  8:42   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-04-08 14:41   ` Alexander Duyck
2015-04-08 14:41     ` Alexander Duyck
2015-04-08 18:37     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-04-08 18:37       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-04-08 20:31       ` Alexander Duyck
2015-04-08 20:31       ` Alexander Duyck
2015-04-10  3:17 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2015-04-10  3:17 ` Rusty Russell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-08  0:47 Alexander Duyck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871tjs1xle.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.