From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
Josef Wolf <jw@raven.inka.de>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: error: src refspec refs/heads/master matches more than one.
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:37:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871tz0rz3z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqha7wfdld.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:03:10 -0800")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> + if (!force && dwim_ref(name, strlen(name), sha1, &real_ref))
>> + die(_("creating ref refs/heads/%s makes %s ambiguous.\n"
>> + "Use -f to create it anyway."),
>> + name, name);
>
> Does this check still allow you to create a branch "refs/heads/next"
> and then later create a branch "next"? The latter will introduce an
> ambiguity without any prevention, even though the prevention would
> trigger if the order in which these two branches are created is
> swapped--- the end result has ambiguity but the safety covers only one
> avenue to the confusing situation.
>
> And the only way I can think of to avoid that kind of confusion is
> to forbid creation of a subset of possible names by reserving a set
> of known (but arbitrary) prefixes---which I am not sure is a good
> way to go. At least not yet.
Just for the record: after seeing the respective arguments, I consider
it the sanest way.
It's conceivable to give a configuration option for augmenting the set
of reserved prefixes. That would allow to adapt the arbitrariness to
match the policies or ref name choices of a particular project while
keeping the set of references addressed by the standard git commands in
check automagically.
--
David Kastrup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-18 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-14 11:31 error: src refspec refs/heads/master matches more than one Josef Wolf
2014-02-14 12:45 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-02-14 12:59 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-02-14 15:16 ` Josef Wolf
2014-02-14 15:35 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-14 16:52 ` Josef Wolf
2014-02-14 16:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-14 16:52 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-14 19:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-14 22:53 ` Josef Wolf
2014-02-15 8:53 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-02-17 14:25 ` Ingo Rohloff
2014-02-18 19:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-18 19:35 ` John Keeping
2014-02-18 19:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-18 20:01 ` John Keeping
2014-02-20 4:17 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-02-20 18:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-18 19:37 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2014-02-18 21:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-03-23 11:17 ` Duy Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871tz0rz3z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jw@raven.inka.de \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.