From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 08:34:09 -0800
Subject: arm-soc: Xilinx Zynq dt changes for v3.14
In-Reply-To: <52B1657B.1030803@monstr.eu> (Michal Simek's message of "Wed, 18
 Dec 2013 10:06:03 +0100")
References: <52AAC671.6000207@monstr.eu>
 <20131213112659.GD4360@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <52AB0ABD.1050307@monstr.eu> <20131217202731.GA11452@quad.lixom.net>
 <52B1657B.1030803@monstr.eu>
Message-ID: <871u17iiri.fsf@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> writes:

> On 12/17/2013 09:27 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:25:17PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> Hi Russell,
>>>
>>> On 12/13/2013 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> 1. Address it to arm at kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people
>>>>    individually.  The whole point of arm at kernel.org is that it reaches
>>>>    the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that
>>>>    you send your email without you needing to know who they are.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as
>>>>    a pull request message.
>>>
>>> Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done
>>> before and this is the first complain I have got.
>> 
>> I don't think I've noticed it in the past. :-) Either way, see it as a
>> friendly pointer from Russell, not a complaint.
>
> that's how I take it.
> The point here is just if I should send pull request again.

No need to send again.

Kevin