From: Marc Ferland <ferlandm@sonatest.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lmsensors: Initial commit.
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:12:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871ugx9r9v.fsf@sonatest.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121017073136.GF3405@jama.jama.net> (Martin Jansa's message of "Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:31:36 +0200")
Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:29:21AM +0000, Patrick Turley wrote:
>> On Oct 16, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Wednesday 17 October 2012 00:37:39 Martin Jansa wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 05:47:26PM -0400, Marc Ferland wrote:
>> >>> Adds the lm_sensors applications. These consists of:
>> >> Is it really needed in oe-core? why not meta-oe?
>> >
>> > I'm thinking meta-oe is the place for this. As a bonus, rrdtool is already
>> > there.
>>
>> I am not qualified to have an opinion either way - but I *am*
>> curious about the motivating rationale. What are the reasons that
>> this should appear in meta-oe?
>
> oe-core as *core* for other layers, should have only the most important
> metadata which are needed for all other layers, like toolchain etc.
>
> A lot of embedded images does not include or need lmsensors, so it's
> kind of extra package which does not need to be included in *core*.
>
Thanks for the clarification Martin. But looking at
oe-core/meta/recipe-bsp I see things like acpid, libacpi, pcimciautils,
etc. I am wondering what makes lmsensors so much different than these
tools?
Regards,
Marc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-17 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 21:47 [PATCH] lmsensors: Initial commit (cover letter) Marc Ferland
2012-10-16 21:47 ` [PATCH] lmsensors: Initial commit Marc Ferland
2012-10-16 22:37 ` Martin Jansa
2012-10-16 23:28 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-10-17 0:29 ` Patrick Turley
2012-10-17 7:31 ` Martin Jansa
2012-10-17 13:12 ` Marc Ferland [this message]
2012-10-16 23:17 ` [PATCH] lmsensors: Initial commit (cover letter) Saul Wold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871ugx9r9v.fsf@sonatest.com \
--to=ferlandm@sonatest.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.