From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2Mox-0000BF-Gc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:42:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2Mow-0006n7-DF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:42:39 -0400 Received: from mx.meyering.net ([88.168.87.75]:44394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2Mow-0006mz-6J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:42:38 -0400 From: Jim Meyering In-Reply-To: <502E49D8.5010301@redhat.com> (Kevin Wolf's message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:40:40 +0200") References: <1337173681-25891-1-git-send-email-jim@meyering.net> <1337173681-25891-5-git-send-email-jim@meyering.net> <4FBA2033.4080002@redhat.com> <87ipch63z4.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <502E49D8.5010301@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:42:36 +0200 Message-ID: <871uj563eb.fsf@rho.meyering.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] sheepdog: don't leak socket file descriptor upon connection failure List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 17.08.2012 15:30, schrieb Jim Meyering: >> Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> Am 16.05.2012 15:07, schrieb Jim Meyering: >>>> From: Jim Meyering >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering >>> >>> Acked-by: Kevin Wolf >> >> Hi Kevin, >> >> AFAICS, only one of these 6 patches has been applied. >> From what I recall (it's been nearly 3mo), there was good >> feedback and I posted at least one V2 patch. >> For reference, here's the start of the series: >> >> http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=133717388221635&w=2 >> >> Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. > > Oh, that's bad. This series is spreads across several subsystems, so by > acking the sheepdog patch (the only block layer one) I was intending to > signal that I'm okay with merging it, but that I expect a "global > maintainer" to actually commit it. > > Did all your other series get merged? There were a lot more patches with > small fixes and I can't see them in git master at all. I seem to > remember that they got delayed because you posted them late during the > last freeze, but obviously they should have been long committed now. I'm going through them now. So far, it looks like most have been deferred.