From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: containers and cgroups mini-summit @ Linux Plumbers Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 03:00:07 -0700 Message-ID: <871uk0b1p4.fsf@xmission.com> References: <4FFDF321.4030103@openvz.org> <500FB473.3090606@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <500FB473.3090606-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org> (Glauber Costa's message of "Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:55:15 +0400") Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Glauber Costa Cc: Kir Kolyshkin , Serge Hallyn , Frederic Weisbecker , Daniel Lezcano , Johannes Weiner , Tejun Heo , Rohit Seth , Greg Thelen , Balbir Singh , Dhaval Giani , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Paul Turner , Tim Hockin , Suleiman Souhlal , Dave Kleikamp , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, James Bottomley , Pavel Emelyanov , Maxim Patlasov Glauber Costa writes: > On 07/12/2012 01:41 AM, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: >> Gentlemen, >> >> We are organizing containers mini-summit during next Linux Plumbers (San >> Diego, August 29-31). >> The idea is to gather and discuss everything relevant to namespaces, >> cgroups, resource management, >> checkpoint-restore and so on. >> >> We are trying to come up with a list of topics to discuss, so please >> reply with topic suggestions, and >> let me know if you are going to come. >> >> I probably forgot a few more people (such as, I am not sure who else >> from Google is working >> on cgroups stuff), so fill free to forward this to anyone you believe >> should go, >> or just let me know whom I missed. >> >> Regards, >> Kir. > > BTW, sorry for not replying before (vacations + post-vacations laziness) > > I would be interested in adding /proc virtualization to the discussion. > By now it seems userspace would be the best place for that to happen, in > a fuse overlay. I know Daniel has an initial implementation of that, and > it would be good to have it as library that both OpenVZ and LXC (and > whoever else wants) can use. > > Shouldn't take much time... What would you need proc virtualization for? Eric