From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, paul@pwsan.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/4] ARM: OMAP4: suspend: Program all domains to retention
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:33:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871up6in50.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1330529106-10423-2-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> (Tero Kristo's message of "Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:25:03 +0200")
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> writes:
> From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
>
> Remove the FIXME's in the suspend sequence since
> we now intend to support system level RET support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
So this is the only patch in this series that is still needed. However...
It doesn't seem like this all by itself is ready for mainline as we'll
suddenly start putting all powerdomains in retention without any
additional support.
I guess at a minimum it needs working IO wakeup support from the IO
daisy chain series. Are there other dependencies here?
If not, I can queue this when Paul is ready to merge the IO wakeup
stuff.
Kevin
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c | 6 ------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> index c264ef7..1ab30a3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> @@ -151,12 +151,6 @@ static int __init pwrdms_setup(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, void *unused)
> if (!strncmp(pwrdm->name, "cpu", 3))
> return 0;
>
> - /*
> - * FIXME: Remove this check when core retention is supported
> - * Only MPUSS power domain is added in the list.
> - */
> - if (strcmp(pwrdm->name, "mpu_pwrdm"))
> - return 0;
>
> pwrst = kmalloc(sizeof(struct power_state), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!pwrst)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 1/4] ARM: OMAP4: suspend: Program all domains to retention
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:33:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871up6in50.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1330529106-10423-2-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> (Tero Kristo's message of "Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:25:03 +0200")
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> writes:
> From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
>
> Remove the FIXME's in the suspend sequence since
> we now intend to support system level RET support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
So this is the only patch in this series that is still needed. However...
It doesn't seem like this all by itself is ready for mainline as we'll
suddenly start putting all powerdomains in retention without any
additional support.
I guess at a minimum it needs working IO wakeup support from the IO
daisy chain series. Are there other dependencies here?
If not, I can queue this when Paul is ready to merge the IO wakeup
stuff.
Kevin
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c | 6 ------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> index c264ef7..1ab30a3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> @@ -151,12 +151,6 @@ static int __init pwrdms_setup(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, void *unused)
> if (!strncmp(pwrdm->name, "cpu", 3))
> return 0;
>
> - /*
> - * FIXME: Remove this check when core retention is supported
> - * Only MPUSS power domain is added in the list.
> - */
> - if (strcmp(pwrdm->name, "mpu_pwrdm"))
> - return 0;
>
> pwrst = kmalloc(sizeof(struct power_state), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!pwrst)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-06 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-29 15:25 [PATCHv3 0/4] ARM: OMAP4: core retention support Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 15:25 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 15:25 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] ARM: OMAP4: suspend: Program all domains to retention Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 15:25 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 0:33 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-03-06 0:33 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-06 8:31 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 8:31 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 8:43 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-06 8:43 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-06 8:54 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 8:54 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 8:59 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-06 8:59 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-06 9:23 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 9:23 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 15:25 ` [PATCHv3 2/4] ARM: OMAP4: prm: fix interrupt register offsets Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 15:25 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 16:51 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-29 16:51 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-29 15:25 ` [PATCHv3 3/4] TEMP: ARM: OMAP4: hwmod_data: Do not get DSP out of reset at boot time Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 15:25 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 15:25 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] ARM: OMAP3+: add prcm chain interrupts to the interrupt list Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 15:25 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01 7:01 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-01 7:01 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-01 8:23 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01 8:23 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01 9:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-01 9:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-01 10:03 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-01 10:03 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-29 15:34 ` [PATCHv3 0/4] ARM: OMAP4: core retention support Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-29 15:34 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871up6in50.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.