From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PM: runtime: add might_sleep to PM runtime functions
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:26:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871uxcr2kd.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311627344-8097-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> (Colin Cross's message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:55:44 -0700")
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> writes:
> Some of the entry points to pm runtime are not safe to
> call in atomic context unless pm_runtime_irq_safe() has
> been called. Inspecting the code, it is not immediately
> obvious that the functions sleep at all, as they run
> inside a spin_lock_irqsave, but under some conditions
> they can drop the lock and turn on irqs.
>
> If a driver incorrectly calls the pm_runtime apis, it can
> cause sleeping and irq processing when it expects to stay
> in atomic context.
>
> Add might_sleep_if to all the __pm_runtime_* entry points
> to enforce correct usage.
Minor: s/all/most of/, or something similar since in v2, it doesn't
annotate all of the functions anymore, just the main ones likely to be
(mis)used by drivers.
Other than that, looks good...
> Add pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend to the list of
> functions that can be called in atomic context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-27 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-25 20:55 [PATCH v2] PM: runtime: add might_sleep to PM runtime functions Colin Cross
2011-07-26 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-26 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-26 22:55 ` Colin Cross
2011-07-26 22:55 ` Colin Cross
2011-07-27 9:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-27 9:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-27 0:26 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-27 0:26 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-25 20:55 Colin Cross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871uxcr2kd.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.