From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751991Ab0ESNid (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 09:38:33 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:56500 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751684Ab0ESNic (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 09:38:32 -0400 To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Ingo Molnar , "Siddha\, Suresh B" , Thomas Gleixner , Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Does anyone care about gcc 3.x support for *x86* anymore? From: Andi Kleen References: <4BF33CAD.2070602@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:38:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4BF33CAD.2070602@zytor.com> (H. Peter Anvin's message of "Tue\, 18 May 2010 18\:19\:41 -0700") Message-ID: <871vd8xb8t.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "H. Peter Anvin" writes: > > If there isn't a reason to preserve support, I would like to consider > discontinue support for using gcc 3 to compile x86 kernels. If there is > a valid use case, it would be good to know what it is. I suspect there are still distributions around that use it as a standard compiler. Wasn't it used in some major release of Debian? -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.