All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] External toolchain: crosstool-NG instead of buildroot?
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:06:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871vioytvz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912202237.58730.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> (Yann E. MORIN's message of "Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:37:58 +0100")

>>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> writes:

Hi,

 Yann> Hello Peter, and All!
 Yann> On Sunday 20 December 2009 20:50:09 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
 >> we had some discussion about working
 >> closer together with the crosstool-NG people, E.G. long term perhaps
 >> getting rid of toolchain building in BR, and simply use crosstool-NG for
 >> it.

 Yann> As you mentioned the subject, I think we should prepare both
 Yann> projects so crosstool-NG offers all that buildroot needs, and
 Yann> maybe tweak a few things in buildroot to efficiently use
 Yann> crostool-NG.

Yes definately - Yann, I'm really sorry that I haven't gotten back to
you on your mail from ELCE - Things have been kind of crazy here, but
now holidays are coming up.

 Yann> The plans for crosstool-NG are a ~4-month release cycle, as 3
 Yann> months is too short for me alone to handle. I think I can adapt
 Yann> the release cycle to more closely follow buildroot. In fact, I
 Yann> think that, to be efficient, crosstool-NG should be released one
 Yann> month ahead of buildroot, so that potential bugs can be fixed and
 Yann> a bug-fix release can be made just before the buildroot
 Yann> release. That way, buildroot can rely on an as-stable-as-
 Yann> possible release. Next crosstool-NG release is due for late
 Yann> January, so that should be a match for the next buildroot
 Yann> (planned February, I guess).

Yes, that sounds good. Why is a 3 month release schedule significantly
more work than a 4 month one? It should just mean less new development
done per release.

 Yann> Apart form that, we could build upon the results of the BR
 Yann> developper day.  Should I repost my summary to this list?

Yes please do.

Talking about developers day, Thomas and me are trying to arrange
another dev day after FOSDEM (February 8) - Anyone interested?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-21 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-18 13:00 [Buildroot] External toolchain: crosstool-NG instead of buildroot? Grant Edwards
2009-12-18 21:31 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2009-12-18 21:36   ` Grant Edwards
2009-12-20 19:50 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-12-20 21:37   ` Yann E. MORIN
2009-12-21 20:06     ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2009-12-21 22:10       ` Yann E. MORIN
2009-12-22  7:54         ` Peter Korsgaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871vioytvz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk \
    --to=jacmet@uclibc.org \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.