From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: Feature request: git-svn dcommit should send deltas upstream Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:13:04 +0200 Message-ID: <871w05kt0f.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <87myj0f3mb.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20080829082311.GA7128@yp-box.dyndns.org> <87tzd4p1lt.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <87y72dkvq4.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <7vsksl2k1y.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Wong , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Aug 31 19:14:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZqVD-0003QV-Q6 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:14:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752768AbYHaRNK (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:13:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752689AbYHaRNJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:13:09 -0400 Received: from mail.enyo.de ([212.9.189.167]:50829 "EHLO mail.enyo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752560AbYHaRNI (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:13:08 -0400 Received: from deneb.vpn.enyo.de ([212.9.189.177] helo=deneb.enyo.de) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp id 1KZqU4-0003tw-Sh; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:13:04 +0200 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KZqU4-0003n6-Dr; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:13:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <7vsksl2k1y.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:03:53 -0700") Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Junio C. Hamano: >> Sorry for the format. Has anybody got some Emacs code to submit diffs >> using Gnus? > > What's wrong with using "C-x C-i" in the message mode to read format-patch > output in (alternatively "C-u M-! git format-patch --stdout -1 $commit" > in the message mode), move "Subject: " up and remove the remainder of the > fake headers? For single patches, it's okay. Using this approach, proper threading of a series of patches is rather error-prone, though.